From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7A6A04B5;
	Mon,  2 Dec 2019 16:37:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD9B1B9B7;
	Mon,  2 Dec 2019 16:37:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com (mail-wr1-f44.google.com
 [209.85.221.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B835681
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  2 Dec 2019 16:37:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id b18so44854189wrj.8
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 07:37:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=mtsxJTM9AjYtQdNz0vYCG1qp9QdNjEjXbKJrLqp0z/M=;
 b=UlZdGXbF24GLYcDn6xRICPHDEodiJkL8VZTgBxOm6U0JCdk8yimFo2YtgkdSmhjc5N
 2O0k1FItGKbvUY/cc+1qcroTmR11rTONN3DnPMtLm6TFP15bKOHCciNUlAycn3NKd1Yx
 IbLd/Uz1TTbuYaTmcOAIJin/ViKZF46rkmh/zb3M8xmvBxM9OMPR648tbYKmQtb1ignZ
 vOPSSxVWzIbQvtew+I1M9eEAe37ErD6TTh+KBEI8rJ6YH+iYfLjynzV4SfqxhT1Ir59Y
 Wji4we9/QthePA+sQ2YpoSWETUZNko00vIyLDg7+8dl0mms6Odn4Z0mV3IeRr9m3AFTG
 ni2Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=mtsxJTM9AjYtQdNz0vYCG1qp9QdNjEjXbKJrLqp0z/M=;
 b=X6Je6+Qvz4/5sALXmJhHfWJHdWoIJS1ayKHmeh9BzGNZS981AJSHYj+ifwqotfZZSV
 C5290e0OBtTE3EcsyFvQ1a0yvH7RpG6hiXnGtMFmKNoO6EWW/ld2BkigWYzDq3o8AxUo
 HLI28gsVAJjIU3rf0GVIKQ3t1gUkVxdzFJCxf852JpCZrAblscmpgG0qLcs6TamKaufM
 0aL4Ud/GZqNrCcSIm0nbrhI14YNfV1EubW8vD3uuw+6JeYkcGk1r/Pox4LJP2W6ks6Aq
 LrbSa4/MCyBiSUC0HI6fOZSntFzh3UMsdXos7QM+NBrSTIrHnTPbUP7kHn4evcenUQme
 yCiA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXCiu6CAKGPfzeByqSO3gvpgXXD2hI/hHh4ixtvI5zWEcjLOm+n
 fC76GM/l564csKRmFDiGnTibiQfMu4FaNaVnb8gW3J4VPl0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyA4QImjLELt156Zqe85zHdmo10kqRsYJE5+N8uk+IZEg06pwvzP8X/LWMVvjVL7xubFaGRD/fg1gi+PkOM9ow=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:f504:: with SMTP id q4mr24136206wro.299.1575301045824; 
 Mon, 02 Dec 2019 07:37:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Kamaraj P <pkamaraj@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 21:07:14 +0530
Message-ID: <CAG8PAara4Hae4JLj8BEiEBgv6bdKWsVXwZef1Yx6XgXra4eJGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] i40evf_del_mac_addr_by_addr in - i40e_ethdev_vf.c
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hello All,

Currently i40evf_del_mac_addr_by_addr() API uses i40e_validate_mac_addr()
to check the mac address and delete the mac address from the table. Why
cant we use   rte_is_zero_ether_addr() ? in this case ?

>From the i40evf_add_mac_addr() we are using the rte_is_zero_ether_addr()
API to validate the ether address.

Please advise.

Thanks,
Kamaraj