From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7A6A04B5; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 16:37:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD9B1B9B7; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 16:37:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com (mail-wr1-f44.google.com [209.85.221.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B835681 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 16:37:26 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id b18so44854189wrj.8 for ; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 07:37:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mtsxJTM9AjYtQdNz0vYCG1qp9QdNjEjXbKJrLqp0z/M=; b=UlZdGXbF24GLYcDn6xRICPHDEodiJkL8VZTgBxOm6U0JCdk8yimFo2YtgkdSmhjc5N 2O0k1FItGKbvUY/cc+1qcroTmR11rTONN3DnPMtLm6TFP15bKOHCciNUlAycn3NKd1Yx IbLd/Uz1TTbuYaTmcOAIJin/ViKZF46rkmh/zb3M8xmvBxM9OMPR648tbYKmQtb1ignZ vOPSSxVWzIbQvtew+I1M9eEAe37ErD6TTh+KBEI8rJ6YH+iYfLjynzV4SfqxhT1Ir59Y Wji4we9/QthePA+sQ2YpoSWETUZNko00vIyLDg7+8dl0mms6Odn4Z0mV3IeRr9m3AFTG ni2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mtsxJTM9AjYtQdNz0vYCG1qp9QdNjEjXbKJrLqp0z/M=; b=X6Je6+Qvz4/5sALXmJhHfWJHdWoIJS1ayKHmeh9BzGNZS981AJSHYj+ifwqotfZZSV C5290e0OBtTE3EcsyFvQ1a0yvH7RpG6hiXnGtMFmKNoO6EWW/ld2BkigWYzDq3o8AxUo HLI28gsVAJjIU3rf0GVIKQ3t1gUkVxdzFJCxf852JpCZrAblscmpgG0qLcs6TamKaufM 0aL4Ud/GZqNrCcSIm0nbrhI14YNfV1EubW8vD3uuw+6JeYkcGk1r/Pox4LJP2W6ks6Aq LrbSa4/MCyBiSUC0HI6fOZSntFzh3UMsdXos7QM+NBrSTIrHnTPbUP7kHn4evcenUQme yCiA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXCiu6CAKGPfzeByqSO3gvpgXXD2hI/hHh4ixtvI5zWEcjLOm+n fC76GM/l564csKRmFDiGnTibiQfMu4FaNaVnb8gW3J4VPl0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyA4QImjLELt156Zqe85zHdmo10kqRsYJE5+N8uk+IZEg06pwvzP8X/LWMVvjVL7xubFaGRD/fg1gi+PkOM9ow= X-Received: by 2002:adf:f504:: with SMTP id q4mr24136206wro.299.1575301045824; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 07:37:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Kamaraj P Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 21:07:14 +0530 Message-ID: To: dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] i40evf_del_mac_addr_by_addr in - i40e_ethdev_vf.c X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hello All, Currently i40evf_del_mac_addr_by_addr() API uses i40e_validate_mac_addr() to check the mac address and delete the mac address from the table. Why cant we use rte_is_zero_ether_addr() ? in this case ? >From the i40evf_add_mac_addr() we are using the rte_is_zero_ether_addr() API to validate the ether address. Please advise. Thanks, Kamaraj