From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com (mail-wm1-f49.google.com [209.85.128.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCB75F20 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 01:37:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id i8-v6so7102905wmg.0 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 16:37:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aDK70AGVaFYqFfmgMyPbQHVRW0hXzNMQxqo83iNONx4=; b=XeTgGmNXsBhk+sctssL3nyWckt+i75cDBmDciEVlNtNqJWXG4deuE/RTH0CWGfe7wW XIBLjSUrpcaMcWOQEjRy/tRIn28J6SkFmCLSwv1h1h37AnEOliziOBddPB2toDUZ3cmW kmh+S3KiVJPyK/5aa1hQm2v48Itww2JOzM+67hJjpH8aD/KVRtT7MKFMVJpvtMjO6ljK ghs0pesQo0G69MnK8BaWtYP5/Un40cYHUxqiTZ24dw4NzVVw7ppwsWuaC0csz4N8pyMV hlabvUtCFKv1yplW4v9UClS2QQilffZijMrig0SaoVcSwvHnb8ob0swC2IssKWEq00xM 988A== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoixHoahpOKBcSRp+IsBpKL68a13/nA8D+s01xTDun1o8+ykarTW 2S9iid5MblW/wNgsOL0dG6vpSwK2ZL9QyltlDrI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV60fT58OUqJwKr7+1c0eX8TbXgZcWYmNTZzOheOFZVxQhVtLr6wQAtPlJlmUjLjBEjKszMZHnTnIAKjEoRODzfs= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9895:: with SMTP id a143-v6mr2428279wme.43.1539214637618; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 16:37:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180911232906.18352-1-dg@adax.com> <20180927003256.6901-1-dg@adax.com> <46a1acbe-53ff-6bdc-e313-c2e720f5ef73@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <46a1acbe-53ff-6bdc-e313-c2e720f5ef73@intel.com> From: Dan Gora Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 20:36:41 -0300 Message-ID: To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Igor Ryzhov , Stephen Hemminger Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] kni: add API to set link status on kernel interface X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 23:37:18 -0000 On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 8:00 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > I'm incredibly frustrated with this whole process to be honest... > > Please don't be so, you are spending time/effort to improve an open source > project which is great, thank you again. > > Why don't we take this as incremental steps, first get agreed part in a > patchset. 4/6 doesn't fit this but I can implement the command line part for you > if you agree, what do you think? I can work on it, but it might take a couple of days until I have time. What do you think about my proposal for patch 1/4? (see the end of 'Message-ID: ', 4 emails back in this thread..) I can make it work without the log message in the API function, but I need some way to get the previous status. See my proposals in that email above.. d