From: Dan Gora <dg@adax.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>, dev@dpdk.org, aconole@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] kni: rework rte_kni_update_link using ioctl
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:01:34 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGyogRZdsJiM893kmExQ=mV7KdYGk6mDTL-rfvdvAeuDqQaR9g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <347b8a5c-f7c8-45d4-063f-2a4b5bdf90cc@intel.com>
My original patch to add this feature was basically the same thing as
this: setting the link status via a KNI ioctl. That method was
rejected after _much_ discussion and we eventually settled on the
currently implementation.
My original patch was here: Message-Id: <20180628225548.21885-1-dg@adax.com>
If you search for KNI and dg@adax.com in the DPDK devel list you
should be able to suss out the whole discussion that lead to the
current implementation.
thanks
dan
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 1:17 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/14/2019 5:10 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > On 9/25/2019 10:36 AM, Igor Ryzhov wrote:
> >> Current implementation doesn't allow us to update KNI carrier if the
> >> interface is not yet UP in kernel. It means that we can't use it in the
> >> same thread which is processing rte_kni_ops.config_network_if, which is
> >> very convenient, because it allows us to have correct carrier status
> >> of the interface right after we enabled it and we don't have to use any
> >> additional thread to track link status.
> >
> > Hi Igor,
> >
> > The existing thread tracks the link status of the physical device and reflects
> > the changes to the kni netdev, but the "struct rte_kni_ops"
> > (rte_kni_ops.config_network_if) works other way around, it captures (some)
> > requests to kni netdev and reflects them to the underlying physical device.
> > Even 'rte_kni_update_link()' updated to use ioctl, the thread still looks
> > required and this patch doesn't really changes that part.
> >
> > Also I am reluctant to extend the KNI ioctl interface when there is a generic
> > way to do that work.
> >
> > What is the use case of updating kni netdev carrier status when the interface is
> > down?
>
> btw, if the problem is status of the interface being 'no-carrier' by default,
> this can be changed by "carrier=on" parameter of the kni kernel module:
> "insmod ./build/kmod/rte_kni.ko carrier=on"
>
> >
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
> >
> > <...>
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-14 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-24 19:25 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Igor Ryzhov
2019-09-24 19:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Igor Ryzhov
2019-09-24 20:37 ` Aaron Conole
2019-09-25 9:00 ` Igor Ryzhov
2019-09-25 9:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Igor Ryzhov
2019-10-14 16:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-14 16:17 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-14 19:01 ` Dan Gora [this message]
2019-10-14 20:55 ` Dan Gora
2019-10-27 20:16 ` Igor Ryzhov
2021-06-28 12:55 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-06-28 13:16 ` Igor Ryzhov
2021-07-04 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] " Igor Ryzhov
2021-07-04 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] kni: implement basic get_link_ksettings callback Igor Ryzhov
2021-07-05 11:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] kni: rework rte_kni_update_link using ioctl Ferruh Yigit
2021-07-06 9:14 ` Igor Ryzhov
2021-08-26 15:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] " Igor Ryzhov
2021-08-26 15:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] kni: implement basic get_link_ksettings callback Igor Ryzhov
2021-08-26 15:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] app/test: fix return value of test_kni_link_change Igor Ryzhov
2021-08-26 17:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] kni: rework rte_kni_update_link using ioctl Stephen Hemminger
2021-08-26 17:46 ` Igor Ryzhov
2021-08-26 18:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-08-30 18:05 ` Igor Ryzhov
2021-08-30 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 " Igor Ryzhov
2021-08-30 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] kni: implement basic get_link_ksettings callback Igor Ryzhov
2021-08-30 14:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] app/test: fix return value of test_kni_link_change Igor Ryzhov
2023-06-29 17:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] kni: rework rte_kni_update_link using ioctl Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGyogRZdsJiM893kmExQ=mV7KdYGk6mDTL-rfvdvAeuDqQaR9g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dg@adax.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=iryzhov@nfware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).