DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Gora <dg@adax.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>, dev@dpdk.org, aconole@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] kni: rework rte_kni_update_link using ioctl
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 16:01:34 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGyogRZdsJiM893kmExQ=mV7KdYGk6mDTL-rfvdvAeuDqQaR9g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <347b8a5c-f7c8-45d4-063f-2a4b5bdf90cc@intel.com>

My original patch to add this feature was basically the same thing as
this: setting the link status via a KNI ioctl. That method was
rejected after _much_ discussion and we eventually settled on the
currently implementation.

My original patch was here: Message-Id: <20180628225548.21885-1-dg@adax.com>

If you search for KNI and dg@adax.com in the DPDK devel list you
should be able to suss out the whole discussion that lead to the
current implementation.

thanks
dan

On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 1:17 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/14/2019 5:10 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > On 9/25/2019 10:36 AM, Igor Ryzhov wrote:
> >> Current implementation doesn't allow us to update KNI carrier if the
> >> interface is not yet UP in kernel. It means that we can't use it in the
> >> same thread which is processing rte_kni_ops.config_network_if, which is
> >> very convenient, because it allows us to have correct carrier status
> >> of the interface right after we enabled it and we don't have to use any
> >> additional thread to track link status.
> >
> > Hi Igor,
> >
> > The existing thread tracks the link status of the physical device and reflects
> > the changes to the kni netdev, but the "struct rte_kni_ops"
> > (rte_kni_ops.config_network_if) works other way around, it captures (some)
> > requests to kni netdev and reflects them to the underlying physical device.
> > Even 'rte_kni_update_link()' updated to use ioctl, the thread still looks
> > required and this patch doesn't really changes that part.
> >
> > Also I am reluctant to extend the KNI ioctl interface when there is a generic
> > way to do that work.
> >
> > What is the use case of updating kni netdev carrier status when the interface is
> > down?
>
> btw, if the problem is status of the interface being 'no-carrier' by default,
> this can be changed by "carrier=on" parameter of the kni kernel module:
> "insmod ./build/kmod/rte_kni.ko carrier=on"
>
> >
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
> >
> > <...>
> >
>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-14 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-24 19:25 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Igor Ryzhov
2019-09-24 19:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Igor Ryzhov
2019-09-24 20:37   ` Aaron Conole
2019-09-25  9:00     ` Igor Ryzhov
2019-09-25  9:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Igor Ryzhov
2019-10-14 16:10     ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-14 16:17       ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-14 19:01         ` Dan Gora [this message]
2019-10-14 20:55           ` Dan Gora
2019-10-27 20:16             ` Igor Ryzhov
2021-06-28 12:55               ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-06-28 13:16                 ` Igor Ryzhov
2021-07-04 16:06   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] " Igor Ryzhov
2021-07-04 16:06     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] kni: implement basic get_link_ksettings callback Igor Ryzhov
2021-07-05 11:58     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] kni: rework rte_kni_update_link using ioctl Ferruh Yigit
2021-07-06  9:14       ` Igor Ryzhov
2021-08-26 15:19     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] " Igor Ryzhov
2021-08-26 15:19       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] kni: implement basic get_link_ksettings callback Igor Ryzhov
2021-08-26 15:19       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] app/test: fix return value of test_kni_link_change Igor Ryzhov
2021-08-26 17:15       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] kni: rework rte_kni_update_link using ioctl Stephen Hemminger
2021-08-26 17:46         ` Igor Ryzhov
2021-08-26 18:06           ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-08-30 18:05             ` Igor Ryzhov
2021-08-30 14:27       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 " Igor Ryzhov
2021-08-30 14:27         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] kni: implement basic get_link_ksettings callback Igor Ryzhov
2021-08-30 14:27         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] app/test: fix return value of test_kni_link_change Igor Ryzhov
2023-06-29 17:05         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] kni: rework rte_kni_update_link using ioctl Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGyogRZdsJiM893kmExQ=mV7KdYGk6mDTL-rfvdvAeuDqQaR9g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dg@adax.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=iryzhov@nfware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).