From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4766FA0513;
	Tue,  9 Jun 2020 17:38:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7ED2C60;
	Tue,  9 Jun 2020 17:38:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-io1-f68.google.com (mail-io1-f68.google.com
 [209.85.166.68]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012C32C58
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  9 Jun 2020 17:38:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-io1-f68.google.com with SMTP id w18so14385758iom.5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 08:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=oHJJXvZYQReD2EvFdQXHq5UyBHcZwsT60Iems20tOlQ=;
 b=OxcwI/tNVrz+6Cr/VNj2cotzUFoir4fPFFU90S2q6OVoRsKai9FEXA9IJVCICNvxPV
 QNJGEv7Y5qBy5sT1DhDDGLrBAhKh8Msd8MuEmtJUXkeEuBlkRfpqY6j7xGVyN6DK+wYI
 SVOinwzCWTF/6mrDIIckRzB1RXBPGd+wq8Gfu2/v+/TgTvXjeFCGtcCpdpV+ot6mupfr
 dGKSCsXeNMg0usqSML6T6OlqG7M/xPnN8XGFR0Q+8VzMeVfgnc2qMNyz6EEVope1J/ft
 36dHgCc8B69hrsT6W+ETt+WCpcz0jHfzth8o59VoN5MXFdB6sOnnUnUeugMsgN1e3rrq
 CsnA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ujPChaJRt0qZlvP0Q1MVpOfR35nOohhF1jU7vTAUpRN9Xjt/g
 2YtC69w3ucOXmcGYk09EPx76wVyjb+0SOrPFJ3E=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyrvuIOwffwBqrpE0DT14B0P//a1T+Y/SHQjRJpUAahSdUeaENMs0n0OQOJF588TgwR+RecEFvjDt9Qw2+8ToU=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:3501:: with SMTP id k1mr26561187jaa.14.1591717096245; 
 Tue, 09 Jun 2020 08:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200421195446.1730-1-dg@adax.com>
 <20200421195446.1730-3-dg@adax.com>
 <5df15087-781e-d27f-b7d8-50b1b8cb0c94@ericsson.com>
 <CAGyogRb1N3X6A2yhX0-9611AOdMaHQf91HBi+zGb144DT-LLkg@mail.gmail.com>
 <80e5cf97-feae-c753-5c65-4f3b121729f3@ericsson.com>
 <CAGyogRb=uGbBsVgMycgLy93EzLafP78xjOX910Yct_1AoxZORg@mail.gmail.com>
 <db596f278ed58965d90b5a94da9b5226bcef1ec5.camel@debian.org>
 <CAGyogRbp_jDjfUVc50uf5QcXnXU2-LBqLdmrg=WG-8Gm4gFP+Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <9782db5b1e5d2dfdcfa8e52410fd166df5db938d.camel@debian.org>
 <CAGyogRYwoF37jsM9UK-8XR+sF2kEoiC+uXPMa-rZG9Bhnn6-XA@mail.gmail.com>
 <f1f83e76a08d238915a2612222f8c93000fae296.camel@debian.org>
 <CAGyogRZfrmGNNHLiaR6njBep8JxDx465=WB1eRxHMWervRjP+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <fa63d69c5fe16b7a4f43e7d0c8ca07fc6d9068c3.camel@debian.org>
 <CAGyogRbpUcffHwKUY83KqMm9CuSxrMD9_JXqHDy=-ppuQTbQBg@mail.gmail.com>
 <7e0c2b55-e842-d5a2-017e-d85194e37452@ericsson.com>
 <CAGyogRbFEfbp1OU9fWwauMdup_h4_fD286T9_L7AgKm1O8T_-A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGyogRaks1O_5Z9E4q7GeeS_NJFaFT1QVJvv8pGaOWJW6AJO6A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGyogRaC-igjD8kbcnRJ=O_x2iTo_x_aayLFJVx2vxM8A_Arkg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGyogRaC-igjD8kbcnRJ=O_x2iTo_x_aayLFJVx2vxM8A_Arkg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dan Gora <dg@adax.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 12:37:39 -0300
Message-ID: <CAGyogRbarONM_h4_V=2G9vYiAvOtqTqRfwDCZWtJecBGCUjAbg@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Mattias_R=C3=B6nnblom?= <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>
Cc: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, 
 David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>, Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] eal: resolve getentropy at run time for
 random seed
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 2:10 AM Dan Gora <dg@adax.com> wrote:
>
> Can these patches be considered again for 20.08?
>
> I thought that I addressed all of the issues or at least provided
> reasonable responses to all of the concerns.

So I guess I'll take that as a "no"...

I have to admit that I just laughed when I read the recent thread
about "why or why cannot we not expand our community?"

This is a big part of it.

dan