From: Dan Gora <dg@adax.com>
To: "Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] eal: choose initial PRNG seed source at runtime
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 15:04:17 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGyogRbauaNeh2npKpKJ9ifpWBoJhP0P84gtkwmSuWmWt0SSeQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGyogRYA1qOhwhRJyTcbK=Xox1r1NThFsTvsmbeoLYux2-TVNw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 3:01 PM Dan Gora <dg@adax.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 6:32 AM Mattias Rönnblom
> <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 2020-04-23 01:42, Dan Gora wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > The following patches updates the rte_random subsystem to dynamically find
> > > the best source of the initial seed to the PRNG at run time.
> > >
> > > The first patch enables dynamic checking for the rdseed instruction and
> > > removes the requirement for it on the execution system. It also ensures
> > > that the code to use the rdseed instruction is generated, even if the host
> > > compilation system does not support it (on x86 systems).
> > >
> > > The second patch emulates the getentropy() glibc function by reading bytes
> > > from /dev/urandom. This removes an unnecessary dependency on glibc 2.25.
> > >
> > > v4: Note that emulating getentropy by reading from /dev/urandom should
> > > never fail, so now the question is if we should just remove the rdseed
> > > method entirely since it's x86 only? Should we remove the fallback to
> > > rte_get_tsc_cycles()?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Dan
> > >
> > > -----
> > > v2:
> > > * Fix patch apply issue.
> > > * dlclose() handle if dlsym() fails in __rte_getentropy().
> > >
> > > v3:
> > > * Fix error checking of dlsym() in __rte_getentropy().
> > > * Style changes recommended by Mattias.
> > >
> > > v4:
> > > * Replace dlopen/dlsym method with reading from /dev/urandom.
> > > * Try rdseed method before getentropy() method since the
> > > latter should never fail.
> >
> >
> > I see no reason to prefer rdseed over the kernel.
It even says why right here:
> > > * Try rdseed method before getentropy() method since the
> > > latter should never fail.
*******since the latter should never fail*******
Did you see that part?
thanks
dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-29 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-21 19:54 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Dan Gora
2020-04-21 19:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] eal: check for rdseed at run time for random seed Dan Gora
2020-04-22 8:22 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2020-04-21 19:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] eal: resolve getentropy " Dan Gora
2020-04-21 21:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-21 21:08 ` Dan Gora
2020-04-22 8:28 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2020-04-22 17:44 ` Dan Gora
2020-04-22 20:14 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2020-04-22 20:35 ` Dan Gora
2020-04-23 10:04 ` Luca Boccassi
2020-04-23 17:38 ` Dan Gora
2020-04-27 12:44 ` Luca Boccassi
2020-04-27 16:57 ` Dan Gora
2020-04-30 8:41 ` Luca Boccassi
2020-04-30 20:43 ` Dan Gora
2020-05-01 10:33 ` Luca Boccassi
2020-05-01 21:05 ` Dan Gora
2020-05-04 8:04 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2020-05-04 14:13 ` Dan Gora
2020-05-04 14:19 ` Dan Gora
2020-06-02 5:10 ` Dan Gora
2020-06-09 15:37 ` Dan Gora
2020-06-10 8:15 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-06-10 8:33 ` Luca Boccassi
2023-06-12 15:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-06-10 8:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-23 12:36 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2020-04-23 17:27 ` Dan Gora
2020-04-21 20:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] eal: choose initial PRNG seed source at runtime Dan Gora
2020-04-21 20:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] eal: check for rdseed at run time for random seed Dan Gora
2020-04-21 20:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] eal: resolve getentropy " Dan Gora
2020-04-22 18:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] eal: choose initial PRNG seed source at runtime Dan Gora
2020-04-22 18:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] eal: check for rdseed at run time for random seed Dan Gora
2020-04-22 18:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] eal: resolve getentropy " Dan Gora
2020-04-22 23:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] eal: choose initial PRNG seed source at runtime Dan Gora
2020-04-22 23:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] eal: check for rdseed at run time for random seed Dan Gora
2020-04-22 23:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] eal: emulate glibc getentropy for initial " Dan Gora
2020-04-23 2:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-04-23 17:42 ` Dan Gora
2020-06-29 9:30 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2020-06-29 17:57 ` Dan Gora
2020-06-29 20:57 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2020-06-29 9:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] eal: choose initial PRNG seed source at runtime Mattias Rönnblom
2020-06-29 18:01 ` Dan Gora
2020-06-29 18:04 ` Dan Gora [this message]
2020-06-29 21:05 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2020-06-29 21:14 ` Dan Gora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGyogRbauaNeh2npKpKJ9ifpWBoJhP0P84gtkwmSuWmWt0SSeQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dg@adax.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).