From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4772DA04BA;
	Wed,  7 Oct 2020 06:46:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E20D2C16;
	Wed,  7 Oct 2020 06:46:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-io1-f65.google.com (mail-io1-f65.google.com
 [209.85.166.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5FC29AC
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  7 Oct 2020 06:46:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-io1-f65.google.com with SMTP id u19so1032785ion.3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 21:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=EJEQA+hqfNPydYAOalB2iC/2Pqv4iGiDA3MVO6xj5GQ=;
 b=EbqYygDYpOBpEz2OzaZ8qnQ9OTchCPsQvfcKKKbszxdMvumYLTUCho+cphEsVw2ZD5
 gmwRC2LCOKF24Df9qgf00kzY6yO6d5OwZtuKD65i4jtMZBTNlB8P4P1Q/b/buJu2o42V
 KZ2IAnXM3rv2slKrVf4Xct1Bwz1FBdxGZbDc0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=EJEQA+hqfNPydYAOalB2iC/2Pqv4iGiDA3MVO6xj5GQ=;
 b=h5UjTNQef76zZU6VoOEmtGlBqZ/VYXgP9ZXnlDG8vjzB0spLU2s+2n7OJh65u42RqH
 W3OxJzCsXjdxC4TvqMyek+AnetEaFv36Qkx5Jqp/1jo2hLEGi3gH2OZVC3/v9ZkBSA7U
 c3Jcu0dkgobWGrNHX32VutSoB6I/3iXdIpWzZfI0oZ0rTcvquaAngiMJyIAg1hXJGrRv
 8aBCANv+wcspHiNIMGXnl5ltZVpCUH6KDw31ZDGnegbWzFXw1ObLpzb7+lAkyG3G/NAJ
 AWuQMwG0l2RTOYf3lEDP8/+RXEP4gNro3s2RyALU8wQZ30uC2RyXB47k0QusDMkvamAX
 6U0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5338kdoDngo6TxKNh83hW7XMmCUXZEAF7ktCuSekunXc0/UgtUWq
 O86LfRyq+QaiRAMkjw20Sdv0ecnhvjtQ5Vy2kELl2Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzxP3rZw+hRzJpVo6fwKTkz5Ee/Pl8SZ86WhuS5TndkfAejmOKE9ocVRlUcxb8zc/kDZhCFbsajszSMh0IC7Z4=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2354:: with SMTP id
 r20mr894092iot.93.1602046001142; 
 Tue, 06 Oct 2020 21:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200122101654.20824-1-kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com>
 <20200930123314.27669-1-kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com>
 <20200930123314.27669-4-kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com>
 <DM5PR12MB11610FC8509EED822C38B8FFDC0D0@DM5PR12MB1161.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM5PR12MB11610FC8509EED822C38B8FFDC0D0@DM5PR12MB1161.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
From: Kalesh Anakkur Purayil <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 10:16:30 +0530
Message-ID: <CAH-L+nO7h7T6rWio76S4eumxoU_icE5zmBa2XkNtO8grQHvXJw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@nvidia.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
 NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] app/testpmd: handle device
	recovery event
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi Ophir,

Thank you for the comments. I will address them in the next version.

I will push these changes as Patches next time and not as an RFC. Hope that
is OK.

Regards,
Kalesh

On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 10:55 PM Ophir Munk <ophirmu@nvidia.com> wrote:

> Hi Kalesh,
> Please find a few comments.
> The name you gave to the event (EVENT_RESET) is very close to an already
> existing one: "EVENT_INTR_RESET".
> But they are different.
> EVENT_INTR_RESET originates from a port reset. It requires application
> reaction. It is widely used. It is documented in *.rst files.
> EVENT_RESET originates from FW error (or maybe any error). It requires no
> application reaction (PMD manages by itself). It is not documented.
> I therefore suggest renaming it (maybe EVENT_ERR_RECOVERING) and please
> document it in *.rst files.
> More comments below:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Kalesh A P
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 3:33 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] app/testpmd: handle device
> recovery
> > event
> >
> > From: Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com>
> >
> > Added code to handle device reset and recovery event in testpmd.
> > This is an indication from the PMD that device has reset and recovered
> error
> > condition.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ajit Kumar Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
> > ---
> >  app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 6 +++++-
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c index
> > fe6450c..1c8fb46 100644
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > @@ -380,6 +380,8 @@ static const char * const eth_event_desc[] = {
> >       [RTE_ETH_EVENT_NEW] = "device probed",
> >       [RTE_ETH_EVENT_DESTROY] = "device released",
> >       [RTE_ETH_EVENT_FLOW_AGED] = "flow aged",
> > +     [RTE_ETH_EVENT_RESET] = "device reset",
>
> "device reset" is similar to the existing "reset" string. Can you suggest
> a different one? Maybe "error under recovery" ?
>
> > +     [RTE_ETH_EVENT_RECOVERED] = "device recovery",
>
> Wouldn't you prefer "device recovered" ?
>
> >       [RTE_ETH_EVENT_MAX] = NULL,
> >  };
> >
> > @@ -394,7 +396,9 @@ uint32_t event_print_mask = (UINT32_C(1) <<
> > RTE_ETH_EVENT_UNKNOWN) |
> >                           (UINT32_C(1) << RTE_ETH_EVENT_IPSEC) |
> >                           (UINT32_C(1) << RTE_ETH_EVENT_MACSEC) |
> >                           (UINT32_C(1) << RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RMV) |
> > -                         (UINT32_C(1) << RTE_ETH_EVENT_FLOW_AGED);
> > +                         (UINT32_C(1) << RTE_ETH_EVENT_FLOW_AGED) |
> > +                         (UINT32_C(1) << RTE_ETH_EVENT_RESET) |
> > +                         (UINT32_C(1) << RTE_ETH_EVENT_RECOVERED);
> >  /*
> >   * Decide if all memory are locked for performance.
> >   */
> > --
> > 2.10.1
>
>

-- 
Regards,
Kalesh A P