From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <luqiuwen@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ua0-f182.google.com (mail-ua0-f182.google.com
 [209.85.217.182]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6A0214A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  3 Jan 2017 08:34:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-ua0-f182.google.com with SMTP id i68so211849406uad.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:34:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=9L0QVb6QU97miq7V9OUzaGxyZoXvBk4W3p62WR9QIXw=;
 b=emWPqJnzOfo3ENIwgy6nWaXtP1PwJNOVFj22hXSxtbZvI0ir9scNzDxlo+A9snH/IP
 F46yb5YKBz9YWPil3uuS2CrVW+3pIDcbYpryls92O5ZHYvAmlqZ84DkLc26IpiMLAAkt
 3zHD/4IZR8/PuquZ3CcqM4MEEPByy2oKoYQGymBgm0YTJPiEbse65TRksLRKCDY4bxWO
 e4SDCU7WVb460H4oz9/BpqGHi1iOTDNTlrCTGHtu50T/90re88gcmhDiEen84omEfQNl
 gHFUi0CnlxyrMvblxWbuIuiEDDAcIShXXzv9QZ3nTo9zctyhQ4/oEQnNTdNfTQSgsUyC
 t29A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=9L0QVb6QU97miq7V9OUzaGxyZoXvBk4W3p62WR9QIXw=;
 b=ADQlGyac/ZQZJHRLzK9FzKQHuDT2rT1DPCnJq7sELHHRFoXb8ubOCzY7o1gSAu5Egl
 T7zxae+QbcgAQ4rAN+uBKgv6fx4gdCaRC+PlB+jxmh8onC/Xb1Ze0c423V/yQ0niKxVU
 YEHtDB9IHO3RnUh+i5wen91rGyvAXDIH6b3eeNjDVVkq+fp880GHI7VZqkuPTVauljym
 QgRqqiAVBglJ+UECZf4NFooTPxjRAoxwIfoirloyWGG83mSvTqws7q6Jxrrffp3xFPm9
 rsRr7dWiBp/jST2FM3fp4TfAokH1z0jzJNFr24AAPYAmJ8TSM1XshhNFxdDbFltNsVJS
 xFZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXI17/yZ5NtrrF2Bnqzbku7FDZ44C3PxIrHHvYSxnpP8Va0tJPOouymEuXUnQWZSaiHH7Ao1HOs7quZjAQ==
X-Received: by 10.176.84.156 with SMTP id p28mr36607928uaa.76.1483428870754;
 Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:34:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.70.210 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 23:34:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CANpwN=uK9OWn=Kpzoos9_EZRFrWVz8Z+9qm09yK8hiALuTOEpQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANpwN=uK9OWn=Kpzoos9_EZRFrWVz8Z+9qm09yK8hiALuTOEpQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?6ZmG56eL5paH?= <luqiuwen@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 15:34:30 +0800
Message-ID: <CAH1gxTs=0mqM6j7TyZCht1u9jeW1cHfozGgtub43EiBbptK=Cw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Victor Detoni <victordetoni@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] reassembly app doesn't send pkt
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 07:34:31 -0000

Hi,

I have the same problem using 82599. When I sent a mbuf with multi-segment,
the 82599 driver's tx_burst fuction
will return 0, which means no packet sent.

I have no solution. Some 82599 NICs can send these packet successfully, but
some will fail.
?? I think this problem may related to vendor or firmware.

2016-11-12 21:29 GMT+08:00 Victor Detoni <victordetoni@gmail.com>:

> Hi,
>
> When I test ip_reassembly app on vmxnet3 nic works fine, but when I change
> to the nics 82599ES 10-Gigabit  SFI/SFP+, it stop to send the packet
> "reassembled" on tx nic.
>
> when I remove the code bellow on rte_ipv4_reassembly.c source code, it
> sends pkt but truncated.
>
> rte_pktmbuf_chain(fp->frags[IP_FIRST_FRAG_IDX].mb, m);
>
> Anybody has some tip? I printed all functions like send_single_packet and
> send_burst and it seems Ok, when I compare ping pkt and udp frag pkt.
>