From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3754FA04F5;
	Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:32:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756DE1BF6C;
	Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:32:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-vk1-f175.google.com (mail-vk1-f175.google.com
 [209.85.221.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BFDE1BF31
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:32:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-vk1-f175.google.com with SMTP id u123so630778vkb.9
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 08:32:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=seagroup-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=oKkdJJ6JR4k1Rn5Lgm2AZ8NVcqYojGlHtAkPsa4keqE=;
 b=OKxk5ifnZFFUpZZiK9Nb+skZehL4JagD7UYUWyDnKzaFAH0mW0t7AtkQpQD91lMBfH
 QUZ25jSbu+7SwURVHuG3jiINUQViqbK7hSQfOdbYKQgooZX4+KiKvCqDDf2UZ3u+QtVB
 mIx3+WPXGH1N50rd6LEvwtWONTiorl9gfqz/wo3cETocGsyge1Vi116X+MP3blNv+ESZ
 oc3iPU1HPm64kULlfrMwbtJJl//jMjpdp+5UEwIWWp9hOZ5dlz7MtvZIOQTC5hNDqYSS
 U0ZPm/keKf8hLCcJICNzkkdaawLqeuINaoVN/h5xjUqg7JfreTSKWetMVJb8xHWmJ5of
 WfTg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=oKkdJJ6JR4k1Rn5Lgm2AZ8NVcqYojGlHtAkPsa4keqE=;
 b=ak3G3X9WxkmvhDTqEd/BjHU88t/cn1wOC7o/zXwuRLfIj7+U7Fk+EX7aAzk40lPGOU
 Nr0btWDa9MFIQw6k5C6fJG9MRZZFmRAjgbrCPhfCWCNixS4oUJSSLe7Ddh/SEODl94ss
 eSNYPQH/rdutJG2AgZ2OY4Y9X1cdmlMuPeQO0N3Ihr8GcTqmIqWuyPBo4dtxXW9jIdo3
 xhoiABB6upz7o015KNPiGijp7OuGHvq9zD71do3DvyLfeU+yew3LzxswHFkOa7ePVWz5
 PEiDG6Frzy6yaIvA16zAFCh2Ei3UIWDkzHjC/uZegg+fKEeoR2f4pkfa9cNedTFasZ7F
 d0RA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU1h8g8GVEfhUywSbANuifYb+cjAkPoffMBXp2ST9IIASEdsJP+
 TqNukwZW3nesWpNdN7uBlIKEsWtpWdMb9s4H5Zlo/ZHIozkvyA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwUOn9nYm1qpLnaKdYqUiCxrGAytAara/8kQh8mmMHCViXbwlQzJwdeqnmtCEnkPW2VND4Dgz6oplP+ZG597Z8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:313:: with SMTP id
 c19mr9548859vko.79.1576168344394; 
 Thu, 12 Dec 2019 08:32:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Haosong Huang <huangh@seagroup.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:32:07 +0800
Message-ID: <CAH5yGa9Ts4Vb7AJfmq-OQVF125Z__WeZuNT+EkAkOfYLX83GUw@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] What's possible reasons that may cause
 rx_total_missed_packets increase in ixgbe driver?
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi, DPDK masters, I am debugging a `imissed` issue when we are using DPDK.

We notice that imissed increase even when the traffic is slow. We are using
x520 nic and ixgbe driver.

Via check the code, imissed comes from rx_total_missed_packets in ixgbe.
But what's the possible reason that make rx_total_missed_packets increase
in ixgbe?

Highly appreciated your reply if you have any clues on this.