Le jeu. 6 nov. 2025, 20:29, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
a écrit :

> On Thu,  6 Nov 2025 22:08:06 +0530
> Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> wrote:
>
> > +static void
> > +dpaa2_clear_queue_active_dps(struct dpaa2_queue *q, int num_lcores)
> > +{
> > +     int i;
> > +
> > +     for (i = 0; i < num_lcores; i++) {
> > +             struct queue_storage_info_t *qs = q->q_storage[i];
> > +
> > +             if (!qs)
> > +                     continue;
> > +
> > +             if (qs->active_dqs) {
> > +                     clear_swp_active_dqs(qs->active_dpio_id);
> > +                     qs->active_dqs = NULL;
> > +             }
> > +     }
> > +}
> > +
>
> Why not use RTE_LCORE_FOREACH() here?
>

For the loop, I did it the same way as in dpaa2_queue_storage_alloc(), to
stay aligned with the rest of the driver instead of using
RTE_LCORE_FOREACH().

Thanks Hemant for upstreaming my patch. However, you added my email in
.mailmap as a new entry — it should instead be added as a second email
under the existing Maxime Leroy entry.

>