From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <santhoshachar08@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ed1-f65.google.com (mail-ed1-f65.google.com
 [209.85.208.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E152EF72
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 12:10:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-ed1-f65.google.com with SMTP id o8-v6so3595851edt.13
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 03:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=UIvD/CBBuc9thyHmWsZNwreH1i7OBkzRhP/i5fmRzyM=;
 b=SxTLY3WNmGVRKWk4J9JsFEMW4mv1d5te8FPhzylXaUJ9Qfd15rNKzk6SsfcorjYEbl
 ZPO+iToTKSMFCSs2L9ujDSy13zSxNF+UnMRyIGfCa/3mFsywZss+ZMfZRTIy6KkRIibO
 woZllzEBg3HCCjPWlRXQJs1fPhprP6XxjmLZK1F6GNt2Kf/APU4WZ7JDjQQBdR/Yzd1u
 VAOEB7BU58eVNt1JqzdfpK2TiRuanWXsC/4k572tJvVd9UITh6ZuurDdLmLjccoNft0q
 CnOv7YW3b5Z+MVOUJALfboajpLX+ElClH57u+q/sNn784w1tmag/VHxm6TEt6k+VuXoE
 bwVg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=UIvD/CBBuc9thyHmWsZNwreH1i7OBkzRhP/i5fmRzyM=;
 b=nOynJO2Xt6tlnTO2z/kGI4cDp7a2TY77jGlxCeR3DMfpJzRsoYthCQmwAym8eGW1H2
 gyBpOA5TtoR18lcYC+IfZXHgIsg8z7wuySv3oLHir732mLnWN2tAuaoyF1yGTQI76/3u
 AxZmtW1TXdYqFL6t12YFvW7pGM4ROYX20SOQys8wu7alpg6qJZxqdR+B28SoH6KoQmjm
 eEL5JzBAiFF0j9AY9WwJKFQTTpAZER3HrMBFmBmJL5qDzlaVKlNj1TJ3CV/hh6Ic3QXo
 oH3hpmDtNs95NmIHOdjsv5xGNLOYrlPzcYFvdnCXWyVlOtK8YI5qJpAnRRfJ1s+HGFUH
 bygQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlHI8E1hhn0P6Vmu5Jkn8W7UBpKBno9PFyYnD2q480SlYGk81xZQ
 5q4HWzFsN4vX5kmy2/R1BlTquHPtK1sL4G8G9BRNl8vc4v0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpdPV46Xcy+SDauOTypTS9D/L8Ker09yVqYdtuEyrS6+kPu9knkgL2svhWENBQKUG9DZ60ULvwGPQ5ftBtwn0Qs=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:8e09:: with SMTP id
 9-v6mr17328328edw.101.1532427007391; 
 Tue, 24 Jul 2018 03:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "santhosh K.S" <santhoshachar08@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:39:56 +0530
Message-ID: <CAHJickZAooHhYASeZM5naa0ixAUb6U3JuiwpaL+YaWS4=UsgUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Accessing "device_id" from "rte_pci_device"
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 10:10:08 -0000

Hi,

I'm currently trying to migrate our old DPDK 16.11 version to 17.11 release.

For this activity, I'm able to build the 17.11 DPDK successfully. When I
try to use the new libs, I noticed that few of the struct members which we
are using in our code is moved to some other struct.

In the 16.11 version we were using "*rte_eth_dev_info_get*" API to get the
device_id information using "*rte_pci_device*" struct which was initialized
inside the rte_eth_dev_info_get() API.

But now in 17.11 "*rte_pci_device" pointer * is not initialized inside the
ret_eth_dev_inf_get() API, that is because rte_pic_device is no longer a
member of the struct "*rte_eth_dev*". Hence I'm not able to retrive the
device_id from "*pci_dev->id.device_id*"

Can anyone please point me to an example code which illustrates the same?

I've already googled and got this link
<http://doc.dpdk.org/api-17.11/examples_2ethtool_2lib_2rte_ethtool_8c-example.html#a5>.
Which unfortunately doesn't show how to extract the *device_id*.

Best Regards,
Santy