From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ee0-x242.google.com (mail-ee0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::242]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA6B1F3 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 12:43:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ee0-f66.google.com with SMTP id b15so474708eek.9 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 03:44:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=fuZFLWJ7NX3Bi6y0HuGy5wIxpQZ3j5GIEvA/zQIh0DI=; b=hTIIyOXc2VgO/d1uNYsfc0kS0n/yus3fG+WVGaW4n16CMIJNyUuExHR6hntdxdNwPl 5p+sYTzj2WqEzoxDimsGPTxiYCkIJx2kvts25lVP0KJ5fjWXGqSfZs7jJ3peIkulTsU8 R5sDV2g9InfIAJX9Db/5j4npSt1GNSv/8LRLxCXjhSANa9oZPO8RCW0Z9eI11sHuEgsg 1MpmZR7ZBJHBngrAnLu8XvRjTRk1X3ioq10hTEwwLBonj8JMSs20Un2tYSQ1GFp21z6i oxuJ81eFZT3a8EnozSgDYPC4Ias+xouQPFYx4ngwLwiD7lMfB/vrLlJ+wmXN3p9/omrg j4Ew== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.14.223.1 with SMTP id u1mr6869265eep.10.1377341044820; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 03:44:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.199.70 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 03:44:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <16204110.8Pd7xlAD8U@x220> References: <521737B5.6010906@gmail.com> <16204110.8Pd7xlAD8U@x220> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 05:44:04 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nulik Nol To: dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] compile error in fedora19 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 10:43:36 -0000 Sorry for my insistence but these patches seem to be of about month ago ? What exactly the commit message says for this fix ? is this in 1.3.1r2 ? Regards On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 23/08/2013 07:32, Nulik Nol : >> >> [niko@localhost dpdk-1.3.1r2]$ uname -a >> >> Linux localhost.localdomain 3.10.7-200.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Aug 15 >> >> 23:19:45 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> So how do we fix it ? > > I've sent some patches which are still waiting for review. > Anybody (including you) may review them. > > -- > Thomas