From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB528A0C3F;
	Tue,  8 Jun 2021 20:48:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E64C40689;
	Tue,  8 Jun 2021 20:48:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-oi1-f174.google.com (mail-oi1-f174.google.com
 [209.85.167.174])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36DA4067A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  8 Jun 2021 20:48:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-oi1-f174.google.com with SMTP id u11so22558774oiv.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 11:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=94HH/LxNHMNM9wHprKSchvkzCcMc1ud/Nn43Y8U0UJI=;
 b=NkPTffiJH85+e6WD2BJoJKG6N8Qt/sDpX767beDcSHKSY8mvdbADT2jeNVKuw4IsV+
 +YLsNinpDVsvqOdMIPVjit9vQW67gEp3/HPTgEuRBcP47BN1KKBXHXC8v59oDQb2j5Kp
 99mDXasq4ftyjDq53z2fKWWknKY0d1++2uMsk=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=94HH/LxNHMNM9wHprKSchvkzCcMc1ud/Nn43Y8U0UJI=;
 b=GGX6/D/2b5sRa+NFdFwTPqkNNget1ZWCvqx0zRi7Vz0diwDpAk1XKt1H71fs+eRZEa
 RtCvZ13UyIJEoyogm00DhEQjYGMs+bdrN2u8Jq4Vi8gH9iRwyNrY6fdtdAoCIvN7bqsj
 Scg9tMZ9VPFZ122x0ln/YohlBjzYV2P6kkbXWz9LtGsl/sZqOceH3uDEFS0tCOcQQNYU
 R12QF75PNBwDEVBO3+QYqu1XinQZxkuFKBfB4IhdPwwFH+ZkY1/cjoy8qpn6AlxtcZ1y
 dZZH11TMkm856QyRJu2sF028uT/XZRP87tMF0Ss41YM6SutylE7igEkasM4KlpLrdXqN
 LZXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532mlZahNV7eZCUHoQ+JiV+kCV7zSI9a91UsV0gpbWFCuhvbjjbq
 TBlFnVdmTwa/1CSQrOw7+LvGkluaNpuBV77h0AHjn7y7uLTgrw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQnVbQmdjGgZDDafJFSQc7ZEI08gb/l8ykht/DbEOYhHM/5N+TA6KWJCOM0F5RUEv/3q2zEO2aF1lPqOfqKro=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:d412:: with SMTP id l18mr3738636oig.35.1623178088904; 
 Tue, 08 Jun 2021 11:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Owen Hilyard <ohilyard@iol.unh.edu>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:47:33 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHx6DYA72dPcPcrW1UgJL7mq6H2g4pE3BxN95gitvmR8LV++qQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: dpdklab <dpdklab@iol.unh.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Memory leak in rte_pci_scan
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hello All,

As part of the community lab's work to deploy static analysis tools, we've
been doing test runs of the various tools. One of the problems we found is
that rte_pci_scan leaks 214368 Bytes every time it is run. There are also
numerous (180856) instances of the error message "EAL: recvmsg failed, Bad
file descriptor". Attached is the log from running the fast-tests suite
with ASAN enabled, and a 10-second timeout. The real timeout seems to be
the timeout argument multiplied by 10, making this really a 100-second
timeout. It is attached as a google drive link since the log itself is too
large for the mailing list.

Test Output:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NejCuba-HnvH9MMg7thBdGuOhQBXKiFh/view?usp=sharing

Owen Hilyard