From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4400FA0350; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:02:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1051BF71; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:02:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qt1-f176.google.com (mail-qt1-f176.google.com [209.85.160.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA501BF5F for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:02:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qt1-f176.google.com with SMTP id h23so12926827qtr.0 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 07:02:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pUcbhPFXptsC0S8xvSShCFgwHbfy0uwmcmRDrvyYMzo=; b=GWao75o55Q1Vbbev8QQVHBAcIeFtMO7gcne6bnegeDtmf8Q++Zwl+VAF4qaLGIT8ho GPLYh4i1zYWY2A3I+fi26wIwrjh4hS9447bViUKpDn6rlFcUIVjU4cWgOyVB+IiTWEXu iHYLfB6DoQyebkBtj35NI+KP+nC1rOPs70Ho8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pUcbhPFXptsC0S8xvSShCFgwHbfy0uwmcmRDrvyYMzo=; b=h52XlfP7SKUvotDqNDbVRR/i2isg4X4mf6vgYBJrE3NRXwpgLpj9Iolqtv3R10fooC majRA5FwAGSFeRHcF/flYafs4HZMre6hXpEhmIXJK4M1ls7l3t0DDUmujsQ0FPp7Pckq SfrEtlNkdVL4NnVZoOHeo5ZEEKKkBOmwtOkBFo3vyFt8jwxZ4pggk+frlTcApbhQNkI9 891wQkk8SsdYl5t+nLTZ7XqUGfXaXtkha6gOxEwzAip8qfWKeSm9kxmu5HiWsALQx70/ 4npOfG/g/6zD2zMZg6SJ7e9BfZSAwwkJOr4SyV73if33hNUJWwtjPAe6zkSA/KS7xGSH tvqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531nT4gFxhsjS4jXauL0msbvsXGl1nexjKVCS1D1SCoXswxldcO3 fz5GNwy0Os9k4WPocG00ZTOpi80G5YFps+pSKWTrIA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzKjhJDlSSz45cqI4hKJOmC5O+inTIyTleYLwFr5wO6zdXCntCuttwBYtHPtIgo9i7OIL3IdyTvU9LKIbsiosU= X-Received: by 2002:aed:35d8:: with SMTP id d24mr16404918qte.246.1593439330472; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 07:02:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2532193.hmao2X3YlT@thomas> <76205809.TtmAlz4aAX@thomas> In-Reply-To: From: Owen Hilyard Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:01:34 -0400 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, dts@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, arybchenko@solarflare.com, Olivier Matz , david.marchand@redhat.com, ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru, bruce.richardson@intel.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, Lincoln Lavoie , rasland@mellanox.com, j.hendergart@f5.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Hardware Checksum Checks Offload Feature X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" It seems that GENEVE is not supported in the version of scapy that is currently used. It is supported in the next version. I didn't want to make the decision to either force an update, spend time attempting to backport the protocol and then adding a way to automatically add that patch onto an existing version, or drop the protocol from the test matrix without community input. Thoughts? On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:54 AM Owen Hilyard wrote: > I can do that. > > Thanks for the clarification > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:25 AM Thomas Monjalon > wrote: > >> > > I think you should describe all the protocols you want to test. >> > >> > Could you please elaborate on this? >> >> I mean doing a test matrix inluding IP, TCP, UDP, VXLAN, GENEVE, etc. >> >> >>