From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A3DA0520; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 15:26:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8761D9D5; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 15:26:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qt1-f177.google.com (mail-qt1-f177.google.com [209.85.160.177]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293DB1D9D5 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 15:26:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qt1-f177.google.com with SMTP id e12so21146696qtr.9 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 06:26:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=g+dvlQWg+2XxvReYRB0aJ3SE5/uS2JYX5uSN7A77eTA=; b=hrrpCzhwRMjMcQHxKJ4H7jlG0e88bfHfesOBD4TPx1HA/Yg8FzDZtWDdr15nTD/kPx Y8PRWy7LmHxLNRACnr0zAlwhP95S0x2QycJ9Q1CVF8m0v95vFH0bWlBUa+TTxtuG/CR1 qXWtzokz2gMBqirfgjNGTkndf+9ujpAYRurXI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=g+dvlQWg+2XxvReYRB0aJ3SE5/uS2JYX5uSN7A77eTA=; b=BBfWSFNQ9dgLzsqRyH7UtRMSyPqMJhNSRTqyOaKwOePCQLRb0EBZmiPmLvyDNt4o9y onitDUMT8GSc4SWXf0RvLh5Ftygi9PgdJDnmD0DVOJt2GZnwMpRRm28nQqMYwysPqKzp 7uTFL/BEDG+2f82ft+viuI6pALJs11IfxeZkrIPFLWqIKnNfVz56o4t7wf35kt6WVJg9 Q0y6Qft8QB+S1i+/dPlfckOokmo/ud8JmqyUGsnVUMpOdPnVI4qG53NLb16mU5zDrJQI OpO9b4HsL0xGI/4LiN95neDxZV8yXLj92xfO7hb35kHLCDv5n7FPqVW1kFtsUMKA3eq2 5yGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533cE68ngT2VGquXoSBZMsZKREA0HV3XgoJjAt2dmYR4EgufKe1V V/BEvS20UQuhcWHnbykQCOkdC30FXsZ6tvlXoFtbdAlqiwJsAg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzIRSNplwo+MTqelMAd6/OBElTBcabCIolOMsLNInF4DvDiaKkTbZG4tykdDNHw1qSbjsYlExI7gQaWEwKw7TA= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:a44:: with SMTP id f4mr12836467qti.348.1593696404373; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 06:26:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Owen Hilyard Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 09:26:08 -0400 Message-ID: To: dev@dpdk.org, dts@dpdk.org, qi.z.zhang@intel.com, Thomas Monjalon , matan@mellanox.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, jerinj@marvell.com, xiaolong.ye@intel.com, suanmingm@mellanox.com, kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com, pbhagavatula@marvell.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, dekelp@mellanox.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, mk@semihalf.com, viacheslavo@mellanox.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] Multicast MAC Filter Test Case X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hello Everyone, I wanted to see if anyone had any suggestions regarding testing the multicast mac filter. My current plan is to send a frame and check it's not received, then add the multicast address to the filter and send another frame, checking that it is received. Suggestions of other test cases for this feature are also welcome. Thanks for your help, Owen Hilyard