From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829E3A0350; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:54:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5547429CB; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:54:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f173.google.com (mail-qk1-f173.google.com [209.85.222.173]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A7D429CB for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:54:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qk1-f173.google.com with SMTP id e13so5758705qkg.5 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 08:54:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GGnyV2yL4g6WK1xT1oWTayaZIfJa1P1TFv4ZMjwXULU=; b=Xk7fGre0OYJdTpyiMAeSIyybnV8hnCckpxSv2jOq9/z5ozE9dG2TPenh07wGZM1Yjh SSab5ucuiCAgxc33spdQwlGWxSJPeFMoYc68xTji84pgE7wYN2BQym0ecER2GKkI3Tap DbajKBr9FgFDuB5jQbLj4tMGg8ZZxe0zI/RnA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GGnyV2yL4g6WK1xT1oWTayaZIfJa1P1TFv4ZMjwXULU=; b=AlOy+8bCqcHZWffrUactJLlqlPEAdXj6f76i/cyFA68tJxPh6QTqTPm7NBRFbBqvjG MkNiGYOuJ5CHcEqp5Y8gby54jxiqBPAR29cF0UPzuNeWpq+oE6kCPhVyzyYnxaHeP66k /n2cCY2CdTV91JZbdJkIrAkcWVCZL4LCl2ZJYFKm6uV6z/tjAafyM6Wxxoa9TgvwosXi fdGQnpm6LUzXyuLWbrBT85G6ebff63vVtkH9DIVrzIU/Qd9zbE9+8VV1gfSfmJqJ4oGA QunhKvEYPWHuEuHD1lOrRZAz+UsubyylfQaL13dsbBU+I5j13vXMWJ0sAR4Ot2hDxX/c Bgew== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531fJagd4zJjpTyk/QRg6K8xgpobRDfksP1p0miy8cGb4MbrHOvh dZhnbgiEkdyVmxkcTWsY5smWXMmhympdljPtfxJPEg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwwJuXwWwQSF6/nb5waHMrpBez+ZM+l+NsvBH0JCi5+lGMHe0ep+K4cL5B+IWW5alws8i9PE0TV7QdFNYQ5BAg= X-Received: by 2002:a37:5b81:: with SMTP id p123mr22420306qkb.150.1593100485837; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 08:54:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2532193.hmao2X3YlT@thomas> <76205809.TtmAlz4aAX@thomas> In-Reply-To: <76205809.TtmAlz4aAX@thomas> From: Owen Hilyard Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:54:10 -0400 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, dts@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, arybchenko@solarflare.com, Olivier Matz , david.marchand@redhat.com, ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru, bruce.richardson@intel.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, Lincoln Lavoie , rasland@mellanox.com, j.hendergart@f5.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Hardware Checksum Checks Offload Feature X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" I can do that. Thanks for the clarification On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:25 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > I think you should describe all the protocols you want to test. > > > > Could you please elaborate on this? > > I mean doing a test matrix inluding IP, TCP, UDP, VXLAN, GENEVE, etc. > > >