From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-f173.google.com (mail-we0-f173.google.com [74.125.82.173]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA92968FD for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:50:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id p10so5675051wes.4 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:56:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=iSqbev+E/IJqUIeMmTJlOdMnFnXn6CeIN8A/pGNo+wM=; b=C3VnBH27j/tYA753f+WpgHqw8t6jVgfbi/k/3bNm3MgN4TU1eEBUUYyozjmRuh/TBU eM6m8E3UoTq+/oRNGIVyq4/KaI2D7bWwmCSpYVnvNc0Bl/UkDWUCb+WTpNY2cXhKFtna lDEEp5d/6FrFNGvozhUFMLXWCYI8nlZjhyRDxWnn2Qb5zwC6bZsPyFxYHLTzCP70PhJp sfkQxOQIV1+PXLUaZy8tk+baOJIkV2ED2iNtxM2G+DWA2+bEUwlasmsbfgq7lqd1VqfZ kPNd/Bn2fkVYp7mBpUDejbJjAy1lMf4ctrWnkIUo1bgjihbrWzIgGTPCVkmwXiSbPjD1 zwng== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.8.232 with SMTP id u8mr55284452wja.64.1412089003649; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:56:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.83.39 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:56:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.83.39 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 07:56:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <542AC165.5000504@6wind.com> References: <542AC165.5000504@6wind.com> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:56:43 +0300 Message-ID: From: Vadim Suraev To: Olivier MATZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] GSO support by PMD drivers X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:50:02 -0000 Than you, Oliver On Sep 30, 2014 5:42 PM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote: > Hello Alex, Vadim, > > On 09/28/2014 09:19 AM, Alex Markuze wrote: > >> LSO/TSO support is an important feature, I'm surprised its not >> supported in DPDK. >> I personally would like to see these patches. >> >> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Vadim Suraev >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, all, >>> I found ixgbe in couple with rte_mbuf (and probably other PMD drivers) >>> don't support GSO, I reverse engineered the linux kernel's ixgbe's gso >>> support and got it working in 1.6. Could it be useful to provide the >>> patch? >>> >> > I already submitted a patch providing segmentation offload a few months > ago: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002537.html > > A part of this series has been reworked by Bruce and is now integrated > in head. I think rebasing the rest of the series should not be too > difficult since Bruce's work is based on this series. Unfortunately, > I won't have time to do the rebase by myself in the coming weeks, but > feel free to do it if you need this feature. > > Regards, > Olivier > >