From: Venky Venkatesh <vvenkatesh@paloaltonetworks.com>
To: "Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>
Cc: jerinj@marvell.com, dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] event/dsw: avoid reusing previously recorded events
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 22:05:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ4WCtLbtuVkjqqod+HRc1PxRwFuxzTLRE3AgL_RL-Hu3C8JOg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200305104651.25456-1-mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>
Hi Mattias,
Have a question on this fix. I understand you wanting a certain number of
events before making a decision to migrate (in the above fix).
However, suppose there are fewer events over a few flows (even if not many)
and yet your core is heavily loaded -- indicating may be they are one or
more very CPU intensive flows. Often in DPI situations depending on the
complexity of the policy you can get delayed longer. It might still be
worthwhile to migrate if the other cores are really lightly loaded. I think
that case will be missed out in this approach.
Fundamentally, the number of packets being a proxy-metric for the load of
that flow on the cpu is simplistic at times. Very CPU intensive
medium/lower bandwidth flows can be picked up in this heuristic. If there
is a way that at the time of DSW init we can have a way of tuning it
depending on the application scenario it might be more flexible.
Thanks
-Venky
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 2:47 AM Mattias Rönnblom <
mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Avoid reusing recorded events when performing a migration, since this
> may make the migration selection logic pick an already-moved flow.
>
> Fixes: f6257b22e767 ("event/dsw: add load balancing")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Reported-by: Venky Venkatesh <vvenkatesh@paloaltonetworks.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mattias Rönnblom <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>
> ---
> drivers/event/dsw/dsw_event.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/event/dsw/dsw_event.c b/drivers/event/dsw/dsw_event.c
> index d68b71b98..296adea18 100644
> --- a/drivers/event/dsw/dsw_event.c
> +++ b/drivers/event/dsw/dsw_event.c
> @@ -646,6 +646,9 @@ dsw_port_consider_migration(struct dsw_evdev *dsw,
> if (dsw->num_ports == 1)
> return;
>
> + if (seen_events_len < DSW_MAX_EVENTS_RECORDED)
> + return;
> +
> DSW_LOG_DP_PORT(DEBUG, source_port->id, "Considering
> migration.\n");
>
> /* Randomize interval to avoid having all threads considering
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-06 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-05 10:46 Mattias Rönnblom
2020-03-06 6:05 ` Venky Venkatesh [this message]
2020-03-06 7:48 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2020-04-04 12:35 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-04-14 12:45 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-04-14 13:11 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2020-04-14 13:32 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-01 8:01 ` Jerin Jacob
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJ4WCtLbtuVkjqqod+HRc1PxRwFuxzTLRE3AgL_RL-Hu3C8JOg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vvenkatesh@paloaltonetworks.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).