From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pepedocs@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lb0-x22b.google.com (mail-lb0-x22b.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22b])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC29B594B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  3 Jan 2014 11:30:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id w7so7937666lbi.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 02:31:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=bt+8+NYCKMs7zAgwblB2/qtb5neAO9H7sDbCjraE7MQ=;
 b=GjPXdJBAHbcc42UZTppi+icoAKfudNEzDR/j5Mk92DJNq6w8hEleRn8NyfY5RymRd6
 Eb4kii1DJ/UkfWK2uuStKzlfyEfIrcDws88i5C0fbcZto0lXM3wbLEN8MTqypawL5nPb
 /U1oFlZetrS3cuwLiY2+VFJtw4bawRTiZIrwR5PbBY+UeuonXyNUpPwCpxeYJNIz+mpS
 obHLQjUZJ+6KROUO6K5OgcSAK+pCgIQErU+VJR2QxYnH0ZyseBUkgtm0uYFieSPXS16S
 LRLPZisE6xbybqplrb7poFh4wzQN+8z6ejWpu/ZiOqqV7y8OQs0gHhmeQyynFvG1NosW
 rSVw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.180.37 with SMTP id dl5mr774735lbc.58.1388745097112;
 Fri, 03 Jan 2014 02:31:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.59.164 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 02:31:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201401031126.10063.thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
References: <CAJ5bv6E-Z5Wu4iKCxMYvkV1bdNyjrStJuuYjrMQwfUgHHQgEVQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <201401031056.16164.thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
 <CAJ5bv6EQrGOKU9bR0FRVJooa14L6oc9u_U_Dd8z5TuQyvxpODQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <201401031126.10063.thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 18:31:37 +0800
Message-ID: <CAJ5bv6H06N0tXb+8kzBsTHcg1TaW57FL_wC0iys6ZhXywW=h4A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jose Gavine Cueto <pepedocs@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] intel x540-at2
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 10:30:27 -0000

I haven't added it yet, because as of the moment I do not have an access to
the built DPDK library I was using.  I was just linking it with my DPDK
application.

I tried to debug it with GDB and disassembled it, the invalid instruction
was "vzeroupper" which occurs at rte_eal_init, somewhere when initializing
pthreads.

Ok, I'll to debug more and get more information.

Thanks again,
Pepe


On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Thomas Monjalon
<thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>wrote:

> 03/01/2014 11:09, Jose Gavine Cueto :
> > I am running a DPDK application in a guest VM which uses one VF.  This VM
> > runs on top of the host that has an x540-at2 NIC and uses the ixgbe
> driver.
> >  The issue was that every time I run the DPDK application in the VM it
> > errors an invalid instruction and stops there.
>
> First, have you added x540-at2 in ixgbe_type.h, ixgbe_api.c and
> rte_pci_dev_ids.h ?
> What is the invalid instruction ? Have you tried to debug it ?
>
> I don't know this NIC so I'm afraid you should debug it by yourself.
>
> Please, keep us informed if you make it working.
> --
> Thomas
>



-- 
To stop learning is like to stop loving.