DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Sharma <intoviveksharma@gmail.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: Vivek Kumar Sharma <viveksharma@marvell.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: support QinQ offload in VLAN set command
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 16:01:34 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ63u-rfzt8bvJvMbRubAT4V_HpguuAa-2_KLjcCQwneDRHaWQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c51470c3-22b1-35e4-ac96-33d9b76b4103@intel.com>

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 3:54 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:

> On 10/10/2019 8:20 AM, Vivek Sharma wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com
> > <mailto:ferruh.yigit@intel.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 9/13/2019 1:15 PM, viveksharma@marvell.com
> >     <mailto:viveksharma@marvell.com> wrote:
> >     > From: Vivek Sharma <viveksharma@marvell.com <mailto:
> viveksharma@marvell.com>>
> >     >
> >     > Segregate QinQ from Extend Offload and support QinQ offload
> >     > in vlan set command. Merge all port wise rx vlan offloads in
> >     > command line help and documentation for a cleaner structure.
> >     >
> >     > Signed-off-by: Vivek Sharma <viveksharma@marvell.com
> >     <mailto:viveksharma@marvell.com>>
> >
> >     <...>
> >
> >     > @@ -3902,6 +3895,8 @@ cmd_vlan_offload_parsed(void *parsed_result,
> >     >       }
> >     >       else if (!strcmp(res->what, "filter"))
> >     >               rx_vlan_filter_set(port_id, on);
> >     > +     else if (!strcmp(res->what, "qinq"))
> >
> >     Indeed this is enabling QinQ strip, what do you think calling it
> 'qinq_strip'?
> >
> >
> > Agreed!
> >
> >
> >
> >     > +             rx_vlan_qinq_strip_set(port_id, on);
> >     >       else
> >     >               vlan_extend_set(port_id, on);
> >     >
> >     > @@ -3916,7 +3911,7 @@ cmdline_parse_token_string_t
> cmd_vlan_offload_set =
> >     >                                set, "set");
> >     >  cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_vlan_offload_what =
> >     >       TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_vlan_offload_result,
> >     > -                              what, "strip#filter#qinq#stripq");
> >     > +                              what,
> "strip#filter#qinq#extend#stripq");
> >     >  cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_vlan_offload_on =
> >     >       TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_vlan_offload_result,
> >     >                             on, "on#off");
> >     > @@ -3927,9 +3922,9 @@ cmdline_parse_token_string_t
> cmd_vlan_offload_portid =
> >     >  cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_vlan_offload = {
> >     >       .f = cmd_vlan_offload_parsed,
> >     >       .data = NULL,
> >     > -     .help_str = "vlan set strip|filter|qinq|stripq on|off "
> >     > +     .help_str = "vlan set strip|filter|qinq|extend|stripq on|off
> "
> >
> >     "show port info ..." command ('port_infos_display()') displays the
> vlan offloads
> >     too, can you please add displaying 'qinq' support too.
> >
> >
> > This is already implemented in another patch which introduces 'qinq
> offload'.
>
> Right, I found it [1], but I believe that change suits better here. Since
> you
> are the author of both patch, would you mind I include that bit into this
> patch
> while merging?
>
>
Sure, please go ahead! Anyways, I was planning to send v2 of both the
patches, which would take
care of all the valid points raised by you.


> [1]
> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/60847/
>
> >
> >
> >
> >     btw, it displays line by line:
> >     VLAN offload:
> >       strip off
> >       filter on
> >       qinq(extend) off
> >
> >     perhaps we can flatten it, to reduce the info length, what do you
> think?
> >
> >
> > Absolutely. In fact, I thought about doing so in the original patch.
>
> I was hoping the change can be part of your patch, but since it is already
> out
> this can be done as separate patch later.
>
> >
> >
> >     VLAN offload:
> >       strip off,  filter on, qinq(extend) off, qinq off
> >
>
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-10 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-13 12:15 viveksharma
2019-09-29  4:28 ` Vivek Kumar Sharma
2019-10-09 12:56 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-10  7:20   ` Vivek Sharma
2019-10-10 10:24     ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-10 10:28       ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-10 10:31       ` Vivek Sharma [this message]
2019-10-11  4:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " viveksharma
2019-10-14 10:40   ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJ63u-rfzt8bvJvMbRubAT4V_HpguuAa-2_KLjcCQwneDRHaWQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=intoviveksharma@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=viveksharma@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).