From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f169.google.com (mail-wr0-f169.google.com [209.85.128.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805A95F2C for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:01:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr0-f169.google.com with SMTP id v24so21731770wra.8 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 13:01:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arista.com; s=googlenew; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=W5OdTNNSjcfhecjHgASGwwOowGlhaDFI4LAMvts96Co=; b=oiZJX8uF+gRi1QSeRgZ+2t2NC6arsf13WzZk9HdAXDuIfraBt+4r+pz+Nzc+H64+QT REXj9NOIdH41hofkgj6oFxxFU4DzwPVNXsZrAcK43L9tLHwbCJ0FAjQMAHlkUM52qoIA JCNpuv/AAhp2gmqvtxqTi2riVGo5jqGOqwfGBmq8nIYr1p5W/v7BdYKdCEYFmSgPuvkZ Vm6Bk0ab42asRS3IsVmBfzzU6bHKwUgc9mdtELen8XaBA8W8iG1YEBEqsKI3lVlVHdqs yjyJaQo4xYTs4SEzDgb64WQdXlka/6Vl6bREUtYk+5YefNKw/e5YZVJKX7jmWjK1WiOP kRQw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=W5OdTNNSjcfhecjHgASGwwOowGlhaDFI4LAMvts96Co=; b=RUfTAbE4DuZDjhoOmqKmAWtZyVyYYT4OfuUFAkgS3jUopCBO3+0pFNqBweeGJPKbyA J7aHWLaBHjijNKc1spo5xBEG5tZkwa7uYgAeKaWnG5g4oF7evcY1m+966AqXecHFC5os JMDDykb7kN9sONFxQ1b+eedToTfZyhs0apKaz15MLtWWrPxNuTFvhf8W1BQR0xbUjmMF oAMhpBfDW6ET/s+4tagkx26RHFUK9jBBzn9ohpZ/zKvw+3DkNoXFeIh4ngrVG9zdF2Rv 4x0tkUxjip+I5wCXsF8La72a4jGdMulbv/EVEAOVtC+26BNPuq6vB9Tj+nh0+60N/dbt VRKA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tB7z1nsv+iJ9uNo3Zb+F1O4HHLHNszr8Ved12dtwmIIvl3SJaJH jMzFT9JjeBU3x+4SiELphhnBh1P0aOS2i+yE4rCnnAHc X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+rUQ+b3zliBhPLwhRIiWXdA1e6XVaqZsWnseEdu2xCsYjmMpeBWfYYE8nGnDDrc3RkP8NCAHDYl0+6qs8GM/A= X-Received: by 10.28.74.91 with SMTP id x88mr2071529wma.53.1523995275062; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 13:01:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.185.90 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 13:01:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9315b1fd275c48508640f4553be62d0b@XCH-RCD-016.cisco.com> References: <9315b1fd275c48508640f4553be62d0b@XCH-RCD-016.cisco.com> From: Jim Murphy Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 13:01:14 -0700 Message-ID: To: "David Harton (dharton)" Cc: Stephen Hemminger , "dev@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Retire x86 32 bit? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 20:01:15 -0000 Still used in certain memory constrained environments. On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:39 AM, David Harton (dharton) wrote: > It is used and tested in production and non-production environments. > > Regards, > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger > > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 2:31 PM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Retire x86 32 bit? > > > > I wonder if x86 32 bit is still useful? > > Many distributions no longer support it, and not sure if it is tested > > througly by anyone. > > > > Maybe time to deprecate it (gradually)? >