From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B85A0542; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 14:58:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D031BFED; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 14:58:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973401BFE5 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 14:58:10 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1581602290; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=039iDw4f/ZvyHnlmc8OoNmRbTAk7wU/UJJsgjHzoJiE=; b=cx5Y6FHspMe4GfyWA9brOkh5UMiS8SyffZA1eqz8CnS6m0PT6mIc20FZzLuEUA96NbzRgg h5o7K3IEK/hFac8rL17HL8PLynHHwkrxZxjY3EX49axZ6VxeYbriDLhneWvYxLc+yv72jG kGp/d19cyHM/2Io9GgfzSynyC0KXAQE= Received: from mail-vk1-f199.google.com (mail-vk1-f199.google.com [209.85.221.199]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-124-HSguBg6TOkC_vALp5gjnPw-1; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 08:58:08 -0500 Received: by mail-vk1-f199.google.com with SMTP id m72so1977880vka.20 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 05:58:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=039iDw4f/ZvyHnlmc8OoNmRbTAk7wU/UJJsgjHzoJiE=; b=pJ53BiMSXn0n9GbyK/BlGcfgwkhzdCOXd4XTIBDIj70sLKvmt9jCBYatAltoCNsyi8 Z3eeOZCrQUuCRkSyA3vq2rdkdzCNNMOuk0Nhl5sIDao7fEXCHD6Hu2wQWwWQyqMAowgS fsHSYJ2PAoaXEhK16LAtnBYjMFaQqVfAMvdF4ZSFG80rVlz56MMAvS5bQd46yEHVngKU u0zpZipEgI1gJvApU7DcxGXW5JRnBx/MU6P04e6n+/lWeGqab0A6BhtLvR9WmV/FN2/b 1SFgGluYuUILAJkhEnMdWU3eeOGfh0EE1oA1/OnlrZt5Y1HP3UnELqb6KplXJdEm8K8h 6lHg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU515Rb5aL+KKGoOwTclVOK55X6NQidn54Pg7pCx1oJj9N5sIAX A21Q6BZWwScXsTgST3CkwAy0dNMe2N8nWTT5UD2OX0cBTsSPJ39D28PSFP6Xou3GGUuQk08acH2 miRfkBrI/4sw5Uq03vLY= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:488b:: with SMTP id x11mr7411856uac.86.1581602287668; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 05:58:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw2umu53Bd+gTSXE3YoyuhBN8F8mgfQEGKIpospTzAUAHnZC7QdI6ZuKKgY1wIGZK2Ff+ipp6elzxmlU/Arl9k= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:488b:: with SMTP id x11mr7411843uac.86.1581602287337; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 05:58:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200212134745.5723-1-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20200212134745.5723-1-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 14:57:55 +0100 Message-ID: To: Konstantin Ananyev Cc: dev , Ido@cgstowernetworks.com X-MC-Unique: HSguBg6TOkC_vALp5gjnPw-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] acl: fix 32-bit range field doesn't work properly X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 2:48 PM Konstantin Ananyev wrote: > > Fix problem with ACL library for 32-bit range fields, > and extend UT to cover such cases in future. > > Konstantin Ananyev (2): > acl: fix 32-bit range field doesn't work properly > test/acl: add 32-bit range test-case > > app/test/test_acl.c | 164 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > app/test/test_acl.h | 43 ++++++++++ > lib/librte_acl/acl_bld.c | 148 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 3 files changed, 290 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-) > Series applied, thanks. -- David Marchand