From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2315A0562; Tue, 4 May 2021 08:44:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E014068E; Tue, 4 May 2021 08:44:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4444F40147 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 08:44:46 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1620110685; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sHjx/PWrtbS2cdHkMANT4I9x3r5t1Vh+jIcA10by9ZI=; b=iuipRMkQ82BoGAhxlILfjv0Badbr3czb+2mOfYvRHnUgCZuV1wqn71+LmROyxSI9u4BpiP 150YdkQWyAHHm/0ahN24wUE1JWjeR2ev36olGaIKEH2A9wAKqvZ5btmuxJ2VaTxG2Z1vCJ w2fWjdmVUXE65xgNwU1lFLq0jgEyoQQ= Received: from mail-vs1-f71.google.com (mail-vs1-f71.google.com [209.85.217.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-36-9cjS3-f8PDWdoDIEn3XWdg-1; Tue, 04 May 2021 02:44:42 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 9cjS3-f8PDWdoDIEn3XWdg-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f71.google.com with SMTP id f5-20020a67e0850000b0290226ef8b7beaso3987026vsl.17 for ; Mon, 03 May 2021 23:44:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sHjx/PWrtbS2cdHkMANT4I9x3r5t1Vh+jIcA10by9ZI=; b=TPBDQ3QklWDfVqtCZKS7pZak9/UOli3SMVZygDvtEiJSn2Z7pMNzrFxJSK7c/exZkb KZVGNWNqayo217MQhs7fPc2MUiPHfPfBdLZnU9r02jPNGc6tHzL58LcLA+brH0RIz9e6 m50zYCemymPHL72BD2QKFqLE7P/Sy5zGuuy47xBLrkxmSkXSAUR9/UEPNMkaBv3Katxw P1Q+pTuutsECBmviJ8f7Q7vyM2BwwDLQQWR2872OQCD5Lm5osRvhCEGJIhOKq2HcdRmv +qXG/WYAEIOuOFVc40qvJoMhIJt6xhSEkdgf+UHJYHEFLdiyHh9j22zS+KP521EFYlv2 FS3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Bb1mdygyG9ByRVkDHbjkPvVv5tsufo3cMaY62Tr7He3LbCkVR 9NAgFRUKD13d5qxPgToSO0n/3s9YxO2Z6PRutfVLYsgt8iBWTsQa+DM9Q1kpVnI/Hy0E2ZyAL5Y 5BnFjfsw5lawAG3F8C9E= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:127b:: with SMTP id q27mr19632727vsg.27.1620110682437; Mon, 03 May 2021 23:44:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzHYRoGeMyy5MbHK6/JCeYmG3Axffty3+3J+agfRoG6G3w9rkbJj+0TrfsMnKRsHbTE1p2bYCbInWRMnfZVU9M= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:127b:: with SMTP id q27mr19632719vsg.27.1620110682216; Mon, 03 May 2021 23:44:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210412082901.652736-1-kda@semihalf.com> <20210503142857.GB1726@platinum> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 08:44:31 +0200 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Stanis=C5=82aw_Kardach?= Cc: Olivier Matz , Luca Boccassi , Christian Ehrhardt , dev , dpdk stable , Kevin Traynor , Thomas Monjalon , upstream@semihalf.com Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] add lock-free stack support discovery X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 8:35 PM Stanis=C5=82aw Kardach wr= ote: > On Mon, 3 May 2021, 16:28 Olivier Matz, wrote: >> On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 04:21:25PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: >> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:29 AM Stanislaw Kardach = wrote: >> > > >> > > I have added cc to stable@dpdk.org because check-git-log.sh suggeste= d it. I'm >> > > not sure if adding a binary compatible change to API is worth stable= @dpdk.org. >> > > >> > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org >> > >> > The issue was hit while porting to a new architecture. >> > The feature is broken in existing stable releases and it won't get >> > fixed by this change. >> > >> > I'd rather not backport it. >> > >> > Opinions? >> >> Agreed. > > Agreed. Ok, thanks. I'll take this series dropping Cc: stable. --=20 David Marchand