From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Hardy <laurent.hardy@6wind.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_ethdev: extend dpdk api led control to query capability
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 09:56:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8w8K3WaTr40q=ZBX1Y1-7LvwzN2kTT=gdEEnFhCUYcxCQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200107145637.8922-1-laurent.hardy@6wind.com>
Hello Laurent,
Bonne année.
Cc: maintainers.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 3:57 PM Laurent Hardy <laurent.hardy@6wind.com> wrote:
>
> In current led control API we have no way to know if a device is able
> to handle on/off requests coming from the application.
> Knowing if the device is led control capable could be useful to avoid
> exchanges between application and kernel.
> Using the on/off requests to flag if the device is led control capable
> (based on the ENOSUP returned error) is not convenient as such request
> can change the led state on device.
>
> This patch adds a new function rte_eth_led_ctrl_capable() that will look
> for led_off/on dev ops availability on the related pmd, to know if the
> device is able to handle such led control requests (on/off).
This patch breaks the ABI, which is BAD :-).
This new api only needs to look at the existing ops, so you can remove
the (unused in your patch) dev_led_ctrl_capable ops.
OTOH, would it make sense to expose this capability in dev_flags?
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-08 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-07 14:56 Laurent Hardy
2020-01-08 8:56 ` David Marchand [this message]
2020-01-08 9:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-08 9:42 ` Olivier Matz
2020-01-08 12:12 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-08 12:27 ` Olivier Matz
2020-01-08 14:08 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-08 14:45 ` Laurent Hardy
2020-01-08 9:55 ` David Marchand
2020-01-08 10:31 ` Laurent Hardy
2020-01-08 12:59 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-08 13:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-08 13:20 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-08 13:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-08 13:34 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-08 13:53 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-08 13:52 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-08 14:01 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-08 14:15 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-01-08 14:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-08 14:37 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-01-08 13:58 ` Laurent Hardy
2020-01-08 14:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-08 15:16 ` Laurent Hardy
2020-05-08 12:03 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-05-08 12:11 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-08 12:30 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-08 13:00 ` David Marchand
2020-01-08 13:11 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJFAV8w8K3WaTr40q=ZBX1Y1-7LvwzN2kTT=gdEEnFhCUYcxCQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=laurent.hardy@6wind.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).