From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C89A3168 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:41:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0789A1E8D0; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:41:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54961E8BF for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:40:56 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1571208056; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=s8UjKXEiKpPaS559bBMJ1GZiwfYaUM3Jdv6+jOUgGsw=; b=Q1zTRmNVvPdNJAF6ziz8Lq2lLuUEgGAxISe5ce09v73f5Qn+dPAQ2S8Jc0f+i6yc8JQ0OA 9B78C6qBrdPOdgyaaMLwbdv8aLNCs88fUobLNmiJ2NvcBcuUemYmipBctLb6HHHvsboAm3 aXTPouB+Cns7TXkgl6wn5F1lSHbQ8EI= Received: from mail-vk1-f200.google.com (mail-vk1-f200.google.com [209.85.221.200]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-255-7DaNdFVUNFGOpaA-o75rdw-1; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 02:40:54 -0400 Received: by mail-vk1-f200.google.com with SMTP id r128so9305031vke.17 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 23:40:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+6H2MxXMhhNCzl1umPyVcOfrzUVa0h19dRmCxZn0ofo=; b=jTG8nKBG4gpUbrSElFBPvQNjNbkGTuzPs70lMjTf0xiajLaZahRPl2QGPuL66v0uVm JiXcwRwaZ8FD430RCq3g1CJADkuA7tcsPBD40hoO924f7DrfqbOliOG5niIjq/4LnHqI xFASNu+nxMyUaFpg7wOD4Z4hn3ACtx03uza175IjJhu8a7bl48DosQnOk3PtlnzNk9ko lsroqZ2lIQyhekZmOaoKvlD3fcqxI7yOS+jukzcvZBVB8bVO3HnemRM6y7qH2muWZY8J dtDvDSjSkckZVjh1dnZN7rRfE9E5n5bg3pLxfwy3skau/Gqh6AMcvzRszbhxP1VbmzGU dCCw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUZvR4eJ7wCQJlmNcQz6Kg7BR2B0KLFXUq1VXmcIBWaKuhg12Gz Of8IcdOcAb6DcrXsttSNrDGOsLGa0Q6yJBY631spNMNpaodCUav5VkdR46q+YyiM003O+2OPK4J GGAZjRa14QtF0+P6hsC0= X-Received: by 2002:a67:fc49:: with SMTP id p9mr22399532vsq.198.1571208054343; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 23:40:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxICmZmT1mTDepXPp5slzdx2cEGVg9MCI8TYKVyRdcDvh55t164DQPyXsk5vpFbWtm4RJKu6H+8IK5IwuvUVT8= X-Received: by 2002:a67:fc49:: with SMTP id p9mr22399523vsq.198.1571208054023; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 23:40:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190919112257.85337-1-iryzhov@nfware.com> <6c6e0326-46fa-8454-2f40-8173fee96858@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <6c6e0326-46fa-8454-2f40-8173fee96858@intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:40:42 +0200 Message-ID: To: Ferruh Yigit , Igor Ryzhov Cc: dev X-MC-Unique: 7DaNdFVUNFGOpaA-o75rdw-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: add ability to set min/max MTU X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 6:16 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote= : > > On 9/19/2019 12:22 PM, Igor Ryzhov wrote: > > Starting with kernel version 4.10, there are new min/max MTU values in > > net_device structure, which are set to ETH_MIN_MTU and ETH_DATA_LEN by > > default. We should be able to change these values to allow MTU more tha= n > > 1500 to be set on KNI. > > > > Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov > > Acked-by: Ferruh Yigit I intend to change the title as "kni: fix mtu setting with kernels >=3D 4.1= 0". Does it sound ok to you? Would it make sense to backport this patch? -- David Marchand