From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F323A0352; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:25:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C791C228; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:25:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE791C223 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:25:20 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1579173920; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hoN2ORsi/BPGWUGs4KHhMZZAtUMkAB7J5WaFh/UGbBM=; b=Q/6brjORWa6fWfKCN0Ps5rcjqjjFbSOnv14GaxfpwipsyfW7JXKck46CUCXbkSAQVXuB1c A8JPeQMkzbfjFhIAtWb4l+7ZKz1xc5WWcphyKCwrHWnYu9qI6JBW3BWr9ZFCvf7JPHDpFl HC0gJPs9rglKiXlH8B2S/9wS+BlveRI= Received: from mail-vs1-f72.google.com (mail-vs1-f72.google.com [209.85.217.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-375-YK1LtFjVP0WzEiLg9jR4Yg-1; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 06:25:18 -0500 Received: by mail-vs1-f72.google.com with SMTP id h26so2056609vso.6 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 03:25:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DOfhbK7yTOecGXc8fgHd+Ojlwdxhol4n08DLxtq6DG0=; b=t6hQeEtps61MCxxcIY2VT0Gxx48HB/FIvjt3qmx10efkeRKFfkhbxDCL5chJU+lF8W R/T08fYi1K4/Lnd4tF3s+PgDwu48ggbA+l6rcXxKHJVZVq4ZDAlnovy4vFzcU/wNE1Wh 25sfmeOy4Xq3KyOG8geAUsLDvCFJis3fo/PfPDdiTC0TPvVk0zXGCe34wnYz8xIAwopa tLIZDE8GQEibIK2FpBX6VRG8z6Hy0k4Hsl4RSoFI1DqLRPZuWH9PmdUeosV2tH5PyoqB Hl4uR2beoQWQapEX7H/I3zSlsBLaMn7SenC3ELVy5CgPtsiImMeWM43nxpcqOQGzgpZv RmNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUkoCryp2yzdy6WJXgxPEt54r5xGLzG16YKYAXmaH5wFg6pifpI b9rMupI2gqEoprkGJkk9n0usRXCskHA0qHjNCJ9Lr0uOqNqy6D5d2YA6Js6ZvJuRq5m2pB+WMLY vlttgdKNmuEDZ+4ZnLBU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:20ca:: with SMTP id i10mr1113214vsr.105.1579173917416; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 03:25:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzV2Lh2EU1UIn6Tk8QgsGazim2+7IWXan9Ya1j8+OhjoscfCUf/zUvPlXggN/KIi2GqfHRVvH8cm3XZEzuqnaI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:20ca:: with SMTP id i10mr1113204vsr.105.1579173917131; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 03:25:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191217130742.165886.15691.stgit@netdev64> In-Reply-To: <20191217130742.165886.15691.stgit@netdev64> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:25:06 +0100 Message-ID: To: Ray Kinsella , Thomas Monjalon , Neil Horman Cc: Cristian Dumitrescu , dpdk stable , dev , Eelco Chaudron , Kevin Traynor , Ian Stokes , Ilya Maximets , Luca Boccassi , "Yigit, Ferruh" X-MC-Unique: YK1LtFjVP0WzEiLg9jR4Yg-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] meter: move RFC4115 trTCM APIs as none experimental X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 2:08 PM Eelco Chaudron wrote: > > Moved RFC4115 APIs to none experimental as they have been there > since 19.02. Also, these APIs are the same as the none RFC4115 APIs. > > Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron There is a discussion on the OVS ml at the moment to get these symbols in the stable ABI for 19.11. I want to understand how this would be done. - I take this patch in 20.02, these symbols are added in the 20.0.1 ABI. On the other hand, the 19.11 release maintains the 20.0 ABI. Does it mean the backport adds these symbols with the 20.0 version in the 19.11 branch? Or is 20.0.1 version acceptable / a thing we want? - These symbol already existed in the 20.0 ABI, versioned as EXPERIMENTAL. We can go and remove these entries since we are not bound to preserve the experimental APIs. But, on the other hand, nothing should prevent us from keeping some aliases so that the symbols versioned EXPERIMENTAL are still available to existing users. --=20 David Marchand