From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B5EA0C4C; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 08:55:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90FAD4069D; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 08:55:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F20B40150 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 08:55:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1634972155; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RIIysyTZUksccUFreWIsobiq4oUaUHlmSQliX9e8cw4=; b=MraKk3I2GI9mUP4RBLckV0lOG4O1/mQZmyCxpHGkFRKowUToVOI3sXe3PCZp1ugT4r43FU mFP3tPZs6aK3XACLXDcErcnEnPjy/n+KBws3SNni8yc3xycHHlCFGXYioaJJzXmI4Vnhe/ JWCze1AxEMRrep/Bpp9GlFSGvEs5RH4= Received: from mail-lf1-f70.google.com (mail-lf1-f70.google.com [209.85.167.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-409-kSTE3db6M66Q10w0fHEKXQ-1; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 02:55:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: kSTE3db6M66Q10w0fHEKXQ-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f70.google.com with SMTP id z1-20020a056512308100b003ff78e6402bso2114201lfd.4 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 23:55:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RIIysyTZUksccUFreWIsobiq4oUaUHlmSQliX9e8cw4=; b=2PUxhroB452+orlmzEVWYeqag9ddD8Z2lILrfPD60hb7lgGiF6EwOZ29wOzTi219eg GA1gUsya7fj/lSIWo427qCaQLpmWfAt2+SKSMR1PsqoJcs6c7QwM6AeuFPBpQ/JmCqPs YPTN7PiP6mfChoMK6GJkV47XIaCkgY7hRxjngvs7MHeTlwRnXYulN+7GrYWclWIbKXZT 6N4m/80p6+YfmdYwuVDwW2tUsHezJzuI/3fdR+bcVi0kLC+5refGcBV+itewbD8uM8wB 8EHx1zrRmU7hdv8H+mXJhBwmE+dbXNeaawtLCu2a+3FVzc3gCdEruXUXRsXKmcLqIX6H xcdA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Pij7zGX9cRzgNlsrFBd4hmZ1Ogr1tWIbu+3mrbES8QIbAZw3y d2pze76qc+gzSH45pGGtgBT3X7MQAnIDNityjEPt9A927BohGzdi0mQw/PVDav4p8/C8fX5PtTr Q20iO5P2bG7L8xbCKeeM= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a54a:: with SMTP id e10mr4697261ljn.159.1634972151807; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 23:55:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxdnkR0McRcF4AwIx2vFzrN0tHyEcf0zFM+5txm9MntFW5dVez41ENIFhpAxkfaQ6GrXthG9xHqYowKYqLQO0o= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a54a:: with SMTP id e10mr4697246ljn.159.1634972151655; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 23:55:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210827172048.558704-1-kevin.laatz@intel.com> <20211020163013.2125016-1-kevin.laatz@intel.com> <2726957.41ROdhHdvg@thomas> In-Reply-To: <2726957.41ROdhHdvg@thomas> From: David Marchand Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 08:55:39 +0200 Message-ID: To: Kevin Laatz , Conor Walsh , Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev , Bruce Richardson , Chengwen Feng , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 00/16] add dmadev driver for idxd devices X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 8:08 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 20/10/2021 18:29, Kevin Laatz: > > This patchset adds a dmadev driver and associated documentation to support > > Intel Data Streaming Accelerator devices. This driver is intended to > > ultimately replace the current IDXD part of the IOAT rawdev driver. > > Applied (with notified fix), thanks. Something is wrong in main branch with Windows compilation. It was not caught before, since this series crossed the road while Windows compilation on dma drivers passed. I am not entirely sure on the fix, I'll post a patch to see if CI agrees. (I still wonder how stdint.h gets included for uintX definitions, but that's either "include luck" or my lack of coffee). -- David Marchand