From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1E543AD8; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 14:14:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F7E40647; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 14:14:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276B640294 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 14:14:44 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1707830083; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vXdo6ZHbtwynpo132yVLK9u3CBt28s/X95A5dXENnqo=; b=bRzmUl7WvU/tgo9mg+u7Ca/P3MMbteMy+0/kUNYYinPmtvgS4CG9x1QW8W+UISMpjxKfma 81ka7BInrelN2GxlS0B9ItsIk3C7g2mwBF3KgIyvq2bSH8sNL3JqaHrUalrKR6QSqMJIi4 zUSSv/Jh+pDsJvKfn7ORm++8w9LuE70= Received: from mail-lj1-f197.google.com (mail-lj1-f197.google.com [209.85.208.197]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-400-BjjufFoXOOa6RKoGqiEgkQ-1; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 08:14:42 -0500 X-MC-Unique: BjjufFoXOOa6RKoGqiEgkQ-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f197.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2d0cbf577e4so43457571fa.0 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 05:14:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1707830081; x=1708434881; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vXdo6ZHbtwynpo132yVLK9u3CBt28s/X95A5dXENnqo=; b=VO/7KSq1KoRsw5WJKMV2vDX10EtqbFO+Z+A3i0WQIO7hCrn77P4anqj/5yXplyV7fc qfVwV7Jt7AhaJV2gDle0K9gBmrafv7tx3Hr4C92IkUT5JAC24vN/hsnu2a2vKa9NDztO rH6VyiQuiI4nfX0iYZFGxJCvgpEtDLw7O1Ts+MVQx1QI+oNxvKX4KuRGU3t4Xy5PAEvG 0qXmbpCKCFbPALxAct9zun22hjmBMwud3OVUiGsHUm0lvd0gUEh6Q6YDe7KDdX0yK098 FoFqoBFFIaZ6LvVyYcKpEr+VBiVY7gZkanlwzZz/ijMCdbxgd0uHNSqButDXpj0RuNuz bBIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzJNB45NUyvlWCpUHLObWHXh1F+s3Q48+4KsgGz81xNsMlLi6xP KVPJtYsWkvySLUjSMIF5y0oyid5lDhTfs3qpWjyj6QQFKDf3YGs++0bZQOASnoAxS2dU9tUnTwY AOj/PvNsr1Mu6SAI5twSzB8WMH4wtUkKugCPF6vQKrENW+ErKm7MufeCl/dQU/jQ6bOTvb59Fnv 4VB/GvPjpmOlPR9Q8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3601:b0:511:5537:fb26 with SMTP id f1-20020a056512360100b005115537fb26mr6861470lfs.39.1707830081106; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 05:14:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEtywiKcn9Zs8LIA3VudrzWl+1JkAhytWc9iQ+9TvNVDAVQ4xpcZybJxQU5EHvjR6BT3iD4w6vyNadXzIc099w= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3601:b0:511:5537:fb26 with SMTP id f1-20020a056512360100b005115537fb26mr6861455lfs.39.1707830080815; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 05:14:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1706134657-17446-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> <1707777366-26000-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> In-Reply-To: <1707777366-26000-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 14:14:28 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] more replacement of zero length array To: Tyler Retzlaff Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson , Cristian Dumitrescu , Honnappa Nagarahalli , Sameh Gobriel , Vladimir Medvedkin , Yipeng Wang , mb@smartsharesystems.com, fengchengwen@huawei.com, Dodji Seketeli X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:36=E2=80=AFPM Tyler Retzlaff wrote: > > Replace some missed zero length arrays not captured in the > original series. > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D30410&state=3D* > > Zero length arrays are a GNU extension that has been > superseded by flex arrays. > > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html > > v2: > * added additional patches for fib & pipeline libs. > series-acks have been placed only against original > hash and rcu patches. There seems to be an issue with the ABI check on those changes. After a quick chat with Dodji, I opened a bug for libabigail. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D31377 --=20 David Marchand