From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC77A04BC; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:13:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E641BFF0; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:13:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A771BFF0 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:13:27 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1602162806; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iseaaey5dkeSbJkjA6YpHPKPAqYg/9CGCphF2+QUb+E=; b=BGAYAFzUTdCc3lkH/n0zsIHavJQDnhOOC7/KhDVxM6a31HNv5cGZH4gXA7xP3MUXpWSTWS 2zJvSMggdTGjijGqbuCwRa3G2v7rUOeEkeFcDfEprSA3O5HZ8XRFcy+qFSwqxrnw+B1hxZ koX/tdwlAymEjatVaumie3SkT9qd4FE= Received: from mail-vs1-f70.google.com (mail-vs1-f70.google.com [209.85.217.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-482-LwHuu_JgO7mtQIclkTWHCg-1; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 09:13:24 -0400 X-MC-Unique: LwHuu_JgO7mtQIclkTWHCg-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f70.google.com with SMTP id u198so708247vsc.0 for ; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 06:13:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iseaaey5dkeSbJkjA6YpHPKPAqYg/9CGCphF2+QUb+E=; b=gXOUhDPWHmf2RwkD2wTNo1wks+rL0MguCr7nbCVBLxF8AZQEKO604+ttB2DGMJ1MoT HIuqhpDqRx97Ofz3wwhfpeRng3QY+l/4f55GwRmHj68GEMChPDbp4f7ORBA5j2hcF5CC lUvpmjGlYvONMsrp+Qm2TKNrhQZrFWYSWdk896mIRNJVW2ISdq49AEc/MOfqM09bVY56 0QX1rpz1b4twPehLrT3ZgREvbIxWjfOtQI+bneqg1XCW85ITZ53OZ1MXSOpy9WKxKWH0 YISHzY3fKPwe1C9wusRly8wytwl84mq/AA05ZpxfTCx9eZC6HxDd45A75uFTkAfPkH/g gGiA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530cWHririQeg53GcyVGI97vim3L94uXUfCMhdltexmvUF0ySLBf oWOwe5+fy/iNlRXLAtXinwZ/qdgZ47NFUjcEaIr/288AYeDEQboy/LICaV+Bub8BVOPDxQNiFKk 6Ig+WXPOxLC2zGtDc4Tg= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:7313:: with SMTP id v19mr4144089uao.87.1602162804295; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 06:13:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxhYnkuyRqWCnGIxiEVUFi6juaFT1v5+I4WvMrj28h32WiNb2Rpy3RDWGY/TJ74wQFbJgOYMas/luCeQ6z3nO4= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:7313:: with SMTP id v19mr4144039uao.87.1602162804035; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 06:13:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200106083423.26600-1-somnath.kotur@broadcom.com> <20201006072232.27755-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> In-Reply-To: <20201006072232.27755-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:13:13 +0200 Message-ID: To: Olivier Matz Cc: dev , Andrew Rybchenko , Ferruh Yigit , Somnath Kotur , Stephen Hemminger , Thomas Monjalon , Beilei Xing , Jeff Guo , Qiming Yang , Qi Zhang , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , Nithin Dabilpuram , Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mbuf: extend meaning of QinQ stripped bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 9:23 AM Olivier Matz wrote: > > From: Somnath Kotur > > Clarify the documentation of QinQ flags, and extend the meaning of the > flag: if PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED is set and PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED is unset, > only the outer VLAN is removed from packet data, but both tci are saved > in mbuf->vlan_tci (inner) and mbuf->vlan_tci_outer (outer). > > Signed-off-by: Somnath Kotur > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz Is it only a documentation fix and the drivers are already implementing this behavior? CC driver maintainers for double check. Thanks. -- David Marchand