From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23F9A04B1; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 14:32:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272901B9E0; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 14:18:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13A71B9E0 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 14:18:22 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1601900301; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eyN/no34tNpnzPItPyv/rpRDv/5nitELrP3Zv/nWXTg=; b=N92Or4yeTEZJ3oy80YcRCNBp6UaCPfou8gVw6NMZr/qFqAkAR2KV/hnnDapAIjEYdckQ5+ u+Z9RfQMa/1denjALuHhFe+W4fay7FZFt0AE1PRVXCs9KDjBw45ekUuKX/126dBs4qqPlZ CuBG71FqiovCI/EtUggjQ8Bq8+rTL7Y= Received: from mail-vs1-f72.google.com (mail-vs1-f72.google.com [209.85.217.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-500-SiB7dyP_N6KG3lqjLmCTjQ-1; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 08:18:20 -0400 X-MC-Unique: SiB7dyP_N6KG3lqjLmCTjQ-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f72.google.com with SMTP id s201so2872760vsc.2 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 05:18:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eyN/no34tNpnzPItPyv/rpRDv/5nitELrP3Zv/nWXTg=; b=se2TbzdYsGO+jApmJJpdA3bxRI1XOIdOiSo3btn36AhDfiTkJWZt5te8wpf36hk+gM X0FP6tcwHDvJ63DzoElqGYaWWnoc/WFUtkrdGCeor7czexESJG4KsKOPk5HQ/sjkeqfA Ni0GJKE/hnF9WevhzER/+DPotthiUv4MyYmZ3gAuT695IoqCZSr3bZBmwbSjAj9021n0 CBQXCHsxWqPSbNQY2Y6K1AGc4xY0/zJuKJDhUSyetSlVGd74ZmuElBOp+EyccMmQgP66 P0C18++lWyaYgmpDaNHSt21H+B5Co8xieHCU/mYJEMbg4m3PtslhJyP+tADJdIpDOLpr 9GRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Y+htt69kIshMLHlk3ijSU71W+fdauC+LQbFQinYP2/CBSG/vl dOrbQLyl5oUzSBPsvc3FuZptJxDMjQwu9pKUyoB9WXfWkYTl84MgzZMeoJ/PTeY1sIKSsSDkOSQ MpOiRuNVVUqR7GNhWGwM= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:a290:: with SMTP id l138mr2822040vke.9.1601900299572; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 05:18:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyz5y9Pz8SwVw+7RHhbDpkyLYqt4vWmqd5yGubUWqv+kjP2/Vv8hjnzbxU+FZ26pJOGZT3NzrXl26CN3/hvhs8= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:a290:: with SMTP id l138mr2822027vke.9.1601900299279; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 05:18:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200911054534.55378-1-joyce.kong@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20200911054534.55378-1-joyce.kong@arm.com> From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 14:18:08 +0200 Message-ID: To: Joyce Kong Cc: Thomas Monjalon , Honnappa Nagarahalli , Phil Yang , "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" , dev , nd Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] remove experimental tags from APIs X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 7:46 AM Joyce Kong wrote: > > Experimental tags can be removed from APIs in module: ticket lock, > MCS lock, pause (wait until equal APIs), and RCU (except for defer > queue APIs) as they have been aroud four releases. > > Joyce Kong (4): > eal/ticketlock: remove experimental tag > eal/mcslock: remove experimental tag > rcu: remove experimental tag from QSBR mechanism > eal/pause: remove experimental tag from wait until equal > > MAINTAINERS | 4 +- > lib/librte_eal/include/generic/rte_mcslock.h | 16 ------ > lib/librte_eal/include/generic/rte_pause.h | 12 ----- > .../include/generic/rte_ticketlock.h | 9 ---- > lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h | 52 ------------------- > lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_version.map | 11 +++- > 6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-) > I will handle the Ray comment on the rcu map. One additional comment: the wait until equal API should be marked stable before the ticketlock API, since the latter relies on the former. This is just a question of ordering the patches, easy to do when applying. No need for a v2 on those comments. -- David Marchand