From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E85A04B5; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:43:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97612BAA; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:43:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78FC2BA3 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:43:45 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1603709024; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tuILfH8tnoVRr4GH/e0sc1Ui4tZW3wwV42jqFjF+VSM=; b=O7W4xV63TZmEj1IGolw+WzzNQcEAPb9Jn6F37UsJp1Un2CCyj/E8DPm+3PjREkmY/KukkO 4SdAkCqkC8cn0J/0CzjSHQ66vQA6QHYUy5pDDRFsyqzmPWbluCs3CCtfevZMVtGqN4nUxT BO8FCh/eNokNkVjiFj0Jp0Iuc48v+fk= Received: from mail-vk1-f197.google.com (mail-vk1-f197.google.com [209.85.221.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-512-rqbNZtpYPw6fPyoFa6HRBQ-1; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 06:43:42 -0400 X-MC-Unique: rqbNZtpYPw6fPyoFa6HRBQ-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f197.google.com with SMTP id e6so3620529vkb.11 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 03:43:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tuILfH8tnoVRr4GH/e0sc1Ui4tZW3wwV42jqFjF+VSM=; b=nNVCuELtKMh0CGdTwImdF+w5sSDBYuRquwpyYKb9+PfIaWiV07EVNHFnmROCBGiFth +DIhVvF/JVqdSs1ZbVMJITyjvYmRqth2llYlJ/5PcjKBh4tNClMgrryCAZ5IvMkonbiW PM6RFg50InbvSaY7NuIYusqGPK1JEg8wBNjko/Hbuj4WtYAGx2X9BaPet+aNbAqBqirf 7F0mWNSDJOUqk8yNY4PQwq7EdOwFyLmpSYkKX1kKSQTX6uQcy68JxJiPWhDv+LtG41Fx a2P1pryovojMCosojCn4Bc1PVm2o3NrdVbVRnNiRk2X3Uj6IBSi/Jh0d1CLs9Yp7Tjaj RgUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530emIRiHVT5liVOScbFI6IJbKMaOvuFeiL/+fYKpea65w8otyzp U/SFfElcL2FucuWXovoTQFVFxXNbxKF4dkWtFKRadVzGgBiKRkfuo9tnYebj0YYJLnx/UtFtWBw Gi+Jf3Kmfm9RvvjDDTE0= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:6091:: with SMTP id u139mr17960231vkb.17.1603709022126; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 03:43:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx/hpoIO3n91tUZ/9y39KcZz9cWUv841myyKITbpU5JSweaFZor6Bps5voFnCatTyzl4iU2zHlfbpIlP76I11I= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:6091:: with SMTP id u139mr17960206vkb.17.1603709021928; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 03:43:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201026052105.1561859-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20201026052105.1561859-15-thomas@monjalon.net> In-Reply-To: <20201026052105.1561859-15-thomas@monjalon.net> From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:43:30 +0100 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev , "Yigit, Ferruh" , Bruce Richardson , Olivier Matz , Andrew Rybchenko , Akhil Goyal , John McNamara Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 14/15] examples/rxtx_callbacks: switch to dynamic mbuf field X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 6:21 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > The example used the deprecated mbuf field udata64. > It is moved to a dynamic field in order to allow removal of udata64. > > Note: RTE_MBUF_DYNFIELD_TIMESTAMP_NAME is an existing mbuf field name. I am a bit lost. How is this going to work as the mbuf timestamp field is used in this example too? -- David Marchand