From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C862A0564; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:06:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63F21C0C7; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:06:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-74.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-74.mimecast.com [216.205.24.74]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A731C0C3 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:06:35 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1585044394; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UnalWwVFfUGdCrEQUVBTi4Prd7E/qdaETiIkcvn8kQg=; b=Qmf6+vDTZqsTBX6vSZuSUG5zEFIVR62MH0/JNgaLuhRdQmxV3c9ZtYfbNFauZKbIpy2iM8 EDa40rCld57HcTb3Dxgmg3QrqmKocOFgvC6qIi5ZufMG2U9qlD5/URXIzYrkbOGFcTyZaY uOPYbvFxZ9XQzVRWhOcV2kaV0hfmsRw= Received: from mail-vk1-f199.google.com (mail-vk1-f199.google.com [209.85.221.199]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-367-7gWkm7OgM8uW_9FZholmjA-1; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 06:06:33 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 7gWkm7OgM8uW_9FZholmjA-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f199.google.com with SMTP id v203so2862708vkd.13 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 03:06:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kr3l5Fwb4e0nRwBWwJvyaH7RI1PT2izqGBLjFPpzzcY=; b=kFI1tfjI2lPbNbqFQdXZsiU8TJjzJLxyEwhT/aJLpOlY79DJInMywYvoX8yndrZQ9n oBvWexPOssnl5XbK+s91bLLmIFOCzCGjiHnd4Aat6qE87yY0q2wdl672wT/uVcJ4QO2n uW8WFZed427gRHoIU0PhOuaYylTkWkQp0gcTZfVzLwvXfYW2jwn2Hc5zvUhuswJm0Q4r yGNYBox7D3hFRJTrXRsEl0jrgh060zy/t4HzNtGtB3LWYlFwO+sSY8O6KefO4eQE+29z IorX1qr10fYxL3KX1/YXG+jw8UX6ie/o+rKtbKrzbAVVeXhPf/b9d/FPk4Va0pDL/hcm zvuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3glIomQwbC0Zcsgaehufis6qS+JRjsUHk/oh49908czktdo1Xz vig964n4nK1FGcWlqmnTqUzGtBANZy/4n8wMr/t6EEgWKEbzzexxZYwGlbWT1YeIRY7szdCxU9N 6zf8H8RVDKSjnRiENels= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:49e4:: with SMTP id f33mr16376251uad.86.1585044392441; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 03:06:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vs/Ku7WTQuZSe8DronZ8mYsIyjhK+P1R1tRuH3/FHTXhhW7RvSzJ37vx78s55c3bDIwDKicHGA0+kVr9J4htp0= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:49e4:: with SMTP id f33mr16376234uad.86.1585044392122; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 03:06:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200323195926.12182-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200323195926.12182-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:06:20 +0100 Message-ID: To: dev , "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" Cc: Aaron Conole , Michael Santana , Bruce Richardson X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/5] no-huge unit test X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 8:59 PM David Marchand wrote: > > This is a respin of Ruifeng series with a patch I sent earlier today. > > Changelog since v3: > - patch 1 is new, > - patch 3 is the only that has differences, Series applied, thanks Ruifeng. Small note, in containers all cores from the travis arm systems are seen, so unit tests will run against more cores than in x86_64 virtual machines. --=20 David Marchand