From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A19FA04B7; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 21:17:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559F41DA92; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 21:17:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D10081DA10 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 21:17:15 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1602616634; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UP6Cmuj54ZaX8USMcPO/MfNI5RDjugeFy8Ya33qSoCM=; b=NfHSUHP+lJh2Uo4SbLYi7Gozw2c51pkqV1DhSoBvUmG1VadfPcD57a4aCUQfPk/awvzsNf ZAvDyhOQ6RtLQ17Wj/bcrQE8PIbmnJ4JoXKTLWDzHr935Bn1TpX5APWan2vdsCJpwIMEtQ 479UBh8mU0bWccWs97xFGPGXNeCcX24= Received: from mail-vs1-f72.google.com (mail-vs1-f72.google.com [209.85.217.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-83-V3IQ8eBANP-RVp4jbJNnbQ-1; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:17:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: V3IQ8eBANP-RVp4jbJNnbQ-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f72.google.com with SMTP id f19so288065vsp.10 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:17:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UP6Cmuj54ZaX8USMcPO/MfNI5RDjugeFy8Ya33qSoCM=; b=O5XLGW3iG9ZpTzYm1++JA51vy+3cTrTbQ4KUDyGHggtPlqx5mr3oCAalqwzrfihrlT v/5GLa1YdsYyvYBz33CF+sPJ0zcT/QCSb5M8NmBXBuZGzTVPdfV8YYn60ShPVs93oltV XEkXRHe7XGI65veiXw500c3E0PbYQXrYVJH+MYeoIPqMaBZ9hCpjsECnMdcbTj1CJE9P 6aSwCIEpdR+7LGWIosOrPr6zZ/WE04SogQYniZkWp9jutkIrzykUneS4p/rp0cBQ3m3j xnjlCMh9d8xXVSDMsSm44Lguh7C10bRYZPQDJIhAlHDNY8vRTtrFzdbAM+kaI6ov3yrX OZEQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Ol9Ax4XgbX0WGMDHDiNQIBsNA7/06us87P1n5RNx5ZaZIFlvb a+Nplne+GX2YfxCMCFfpPqmL8+qyxPj3anP85Y8Fnn/w5VU8uhMBWdFVm7PNqDWIZaQs7s0m5i9 Uz12w0yGDBwzEdFZngtk= X-Received: by 2002:a67:fd7a:: with SMTP id h26mr1457549vsa.27.1602616632228; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:17:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzNmGy1u7FJInpjBLjGEt8oqC7kA1M2htz7oeNCHIQLyvO1JXVbESA6iz3nPuapk79MUYwhmzBXp6rB9LPle2U= X-Received: by 2002:a67:fd7a:: with SMTP id h26mr1457526vsa.27.1602616631952; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:17:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201005184526.7465-1-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> <20201006150316.5776-1-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> <20201006150316.5776-8-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20201006150316.5776-8-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 21:17:00 +0200 Message-ID: To: Konstantin Ananyev , Bruce Richardson Cc: dev , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" , Vladimir Medvedkin Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 07/14] acl: add infrastructure to support AVX512 classify X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Archived-At: List-Archive: On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 5:11 PM Konstantin Ananyev wrote: > diff --git a/config/x86/meson.build b/config/x86/meson.build > index fea4d54035..724e69f4c4 100644 > --- a/config/x86/meson.build > +++ b/config/x86/meson.build > @@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ foreach f:base_flags > endforeach > > optional_flags = ['AES', 'PCLMUL', > - 'AVX', 'AVX2', 'AVX512F', > + 'AVX', 'AVX2', > + 'AVX512F', 'AVX512VL', 'AVX512CD', 'AVX512BW', > 'RDRND', 'RDSEED'] Rebasing on current main and resolving the conflict with the net crc patches. I am for sorting this alphabetically as the current order seems chaotic. The diff in this patch against origin/main would be: -optional_flags = ['AES', 'PCLMUL', - 'AVX', 'AVX2', 'AVX512F', - 'RDRND', 'RDSEED', - 'AVX512BW', 'AVX512DQ', - 'AVX512VL', 'VPCLMULQDQ'] +optional_flags = [ + 'AES', + 'AVX', + 'AVX2', + 'AVX512BW', + 'AVX512CD', + 'AVX512DQ', + 'AVX512F', + 'AVX512VL', + 'PCLMUL', + 'RDRND', + 'RDSEED', + 'VPCLMULQDQ', +] Objection? > foreach f:optional_flags > if cc.get_define('__@0@__'.format(f), args: machine_args) == '1' Thanks. -- David Marchand