From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847B3A32A2 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 21:43:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249C71EC2A; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 21:43:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE0E1EC1A for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 21:43:25 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1571946204; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=y29QgFl+eHZbIkvcJ4Kc9JUX2DMcS1qkhhCdNZSgi8k=; b=YJldrmSxawpxKcNiAjUGlIHY8tYvwp2UQfg57iTZS1Q5B60MhDxDf2NXscl+1JXstklchs kKa9Q9L+ox/Juu/cmGQku0vSRq28lRMNBYhc/gXiBr/HgbCDPSi4+zJg5ykCHlIByVcx8Y WsImR1JOBr9dEweWWKMDKvith4HPshY= Received: from mail-vk1-f200.google.com (mail-vk1-f200.google.com [209.85.221.200]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-152-dwARlhtbMSKkkZkwrXMG-g-1; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:43:23 -0400 Received: by mail-vk1-f200.google.com with SMTP id y27so7734005vke.12 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:43:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=y29QgFl+eHZbIkvcJ4Kc9JUX2DMcS1qkhhCdNZSgi8k=; b=i9HJyJ+n15hSGhaWR2VmuiQxL1JvD16ENeEZ1QqghFqhLIaHkbt0mK8dlONwhQ7s4Q RPQR04Tt569jRIWCO9zo9VPe58g/8Tc9JQPv9cX9V47jUEHour0MwH8qgM5jbiWH/a5W Mu7YK0Y2+uWewWQM15d6EMPyEAItkcpg0JSgcdepOLOPy0KHxD2gxL+RzOSbVE0kfsyh BNw7cBnPx4qGOXYyLo2HatqQboIYtjqdCA8DYaqiJZxKoXOzK8uum3FBHzr+TuYOX7e1 /baRGK5PcDqeGqef3aoTi+Iyw4DZzlTxvpvG67vbQOR+QmLmD52d4QeqMjfNEc0nPMXK XPdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV3yZbhrbPYs4S1Qyrh+cESwZVOaaMelYrHv5+HbLDoQG0GhFfF fuDi8y+6tYnvoXEFAgYoiRqL9McpbFlzVlEvtP14Q4Aa1seueEyGOHeVBFLS7EsvyoHBuzh5R2N h32o/ttJ/WkErnlON3BY= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:3772:: with SMTP id a47mr1863365uae.53.1571946203059; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:43:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy5YectVYOf0/BIvEz2NPCvMUwQWmme12t63odkE/bUxcK4Huhxsa5pAXgwDejIEtDTKY5YtBzDvBA+hL7+194= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:3772:: with SMTP id a47mr1863354uae.53.1571946202784; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:43:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190910110324.27861-1-vattunuru@marvell.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 21:43:11 +0200 Message-ID: To: Jerin Jacob Cc: Vamsi Attunuru , dpdk-dev , Thomas Monjalon , Jerin Jacob X-MC-Unique: dwARlhtbMSKkkZkwrXMG-g-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/1] mempool/octeontx2: remove minimum chunck size limitation X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 5:49 PM Jerin Jacob wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 4:33 PM wrote: > > > > From: Vamsi Attunuru > > > > Memory required for the mempool objects need not be physically > > contiguous on octeontx2's HW, mempool pmd supports the minimum chunk > > size set by the default handler. Hence discarding the limitation set > > by the pmd on the min_chunk_size value. > > > > Signed-off-by: Vamsi Attunuru > > Acked-by: Jerin Jacob Applied, thanks. -- David Marchand