From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3829242FA5; Mon, 31 Jul 2023 17:21:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B614A40A89; Mon, 31 Jul 2023 17:21:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53EA44067B for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2023 17:21:43 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1690816902; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UBLXY16UuTAC8ESq8UcCDzqUkBw8PGKDeHf0b6SzUEk=; b=gjiX/imIQXyaKEqNU2+vZtp5BLsre9mn1QVEgw/26tNVHPbC4UhBwIXRpJuceohphOFzx4 ZKFbLLtIFoaqyec2t1rUfA2sdOZu/6np4KCmKD5NucGYKeuS13USqGGRHngp+zibOeCv+s 8gUOI6tD7job4MfK3RHUqfc6LOWsTKQ= Received: from mail-pj1-f70.google.com (mail-pj1-f70.google.com [209.85.216.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-498-J52cduhyMGqVq2tinZenKg-1; Mon, 31 Jul 2023 11:21:41 -0400 X-MC-Unique: J52cduhyMGqVq2tinZenKg-1 Received: by mail-pj1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2681d440a95so2878160a91.3 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2023 08:21:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1690816900; x=1691421700; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=UBLXY16UuTAC8ESq8UcCDzqUkBw8PGKDeHf0b6SzUEk=; b=McUjEM7DwHga3M/hC+g8UHbNmc4+kHhrAy3wzgLYMDuxTk8VExFe3biyvYwSASry27 GyebMkClAcjqr1ELnH+ZKsLbr3BLTaTuM9+UlSsMWvQiIhhVS91LWurtgBMJ9eNR9btY /HnBgaU/D9QZA2ClxvYafpYGYK2Vcxo++2l1pi2ad9rk/v4o0YGmGpf/dYFF5Sa6im0D zq5DGYhZnc1dC5xd3Qf74g4JKAyvvyGnhWLG8t3Qeq5P9Urrb+XlcI37QuzZq+fhPJGe +oO9NXVhbsNo23UBhaFl8uEdBmtUjM8UBz2E94Y2KRSODWLqYMcSO4p1nHX17Bnq4Iw/ MY7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLZoUsKNDzBYdS66xTECjXpPkXzdn0Onn6xdvygp/ctefV0/H176 djyfQvPZ5Uilk30CHcBpR1FpfWu4bqWzFnBR6ewmZazKVYxTVx5eeJVurOf4NOC3F9VGLN+s4O2 3nUpqOtP6P/F56xy39Zk= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1910:b0:268:18d2:3e98 with SMTP id mp16-20020a17090b191000b0026818d23e98mr8613622pjb.43.1690816900419; Mon, 31 Jul 2023 08:21:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlFwxfwvHOxgev/utc9Ke+7aC+NDBwfewHPMDH+RGdeLGC1kgBnEFe/h2VDQZFDgXaKk0rxLgARyCADPZDf+M7s= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1910:b0:268:18d2:3e98 with SMTP id mp16-20020a17090b191000b0026818d23e98mr8613600pjb.43.1690816900173; Mon, 31 Jul 2023 08:21:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230729225438.122954-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20230730021206.6381-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20230730101259.433d4067@hermes.local> <2655909.KRxA6XjA2N@thomas> <20230731081345.4d7c8b66@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <20230731081345.4d7c8b66@hermes.local> From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 17:21:28 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kni: remove deprecated kernel network interface To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Thomas Monjalon , dev@dpdk.org, Maxime Coquelin , Chenbo Xia , Anatoly Burakov , Cristian Dumitrescu , Nithin Dabilpuram , Kiran Kumar K , Sunil Kumar Kori , Satha Rao , Bruce Richardson X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 5:13=E2=80=AFPM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > 2. The OVSrobot is looking into the port library to see the kni symbo= ls. > > > But port is marked as deprecated already. > > > Perhaps we should just pull out port first? > > > > No we must support it until it is removed. > > You should either disable or remove KNI from the port library. > > The patch removed from port library and it builds but the ABI > robot was looking for symbols. The ABI check was still active by the time you submitted this series. Please resend it now that the ABI check is disabled with rc0 merged. --=20 David Marchand