From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51A3A0C55; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 09:36:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9352A40F35; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 09:36:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230B940E5A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 09:36:47 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635928606; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EF21BcxN911oClwn7g8sBpdmgOIlutsq0fGya5O0ZYM=; b=fJestgr2q0oJbqCdzKhaE/9iIhfSnJFuMrHQJAorJ7fxW/2QBPOXMG1eTq/mecmLhnC521 9iBleFW149jmduiZMteK5EYiG3IzGseePYzB8NXWFKd7oKB46MvFttNUw1eXIzbAuK220i 09o+h7ToGCM+ZzKzjUv73y9YZau5beQ= Received: from mail-lj1-f200.google.com (mail-lj1-f200.google.com [209.85.208.200]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-536-i47t_qL2O7WhjQzKOwtQfg-1; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 04:36:39 -0400 X-MC-Unique: i47t_qL2O7WhjQzKOwtQfg-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f200.google.com with SMTP id bn14-20020a05651c178e00b002164a557684so798237ljb.6 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 01:36:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EF21BcxN911oClwn7g8sBpdmgOIlutsq0fGya5O0ZYM=; b=3w6HzE16cmyUboggrhtIE6aSabq6e11s8sUBmIeApT0BwI35R2idKebkiy1XQfvG11 VE6ZhD0CXXKkxjJY9l6c7LmaE6qEqt+3c4Zgsr/Ybyfi3ijLnzx11j9gdTVpgcrogZCI CnUy8qFPSiDW7S9BByi+ggpZsy27IWB68savzzk/5JLqm3OckebiUIT4ZEAOEUTVJdcM 3OMyy8zYkouQ/YgVfUmPFm5AuR1OjbzaovHsK3dspomOzXiQ7kfFjonaI/zFXU0MsvyJ xraonVFz3VGS/bxobEpY2IErxLlonnrb+7MlSFKEWKM+LENmFhG+xgYcz3pJx4q8n/n2 XIUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Bt4GhbZXQ2RGnSmbbcxcipM5qT01LuN5cJXPPcKJsrL7o1JCr P7ZkdzYin8prGKbnXOEFCs9rlw5GWUtH2ROm28HzuWWTKAbzI9iUYnGR2LIvUrHcW9AM9dMA6e5 kga2xRolTBRktVi36hJ4= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8e76:: with SMTP id t22mr9535603ljk.81.1635928598216; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 01:36:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw1nhfNiiJxZCvWLtRte3ypHuMnNl340PvXuKbke7jI4kZtBjou+Nqq9Nre65ND7qwL5ZXJXRbYvSOqtsckGsw= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8e76:: with SMTP id t22mr9535560ljk.81.1635928597807; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 01:36:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211102104748.57078-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 09:36:26 +0100 Message-ID: To: "Xia, Chenbo" , Maxime Coquelin Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Liu, Changpeng" , Thomas Monjalon , Aaron Conole , dpdklab , ci@dpdk.org Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: rename driver callbacks struct X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 9:16 AM Xia, Chenbo wrote: > Testing issues reported in patchwork is expected as SPDK uses > this struct, so we can ignore it as SPDK will rename it when it > adapts to DPDK 21.11 Please, no. We can't simply say "ignore failure in CI". The SPDK build test must be disabled in CI first. You can create a bugzilla and assign it to UNH lab. Example: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579 Once done, we can merge this patch in DPDK. In parallel, either prepare the patch or talk to SPDK guys to handle this change. Once this is done, update the bugzilla so that we can get SPDK build tested again in CI. Thanks. -- David Marchand