From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC6DA04C2; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 17:19:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15DF62952; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 17:19:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E033FA3 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 17:19:20 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1574698760; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CJE6w4Z4xU3m7DYbkhRLAMAVW5KcHj6XTuaysFPnNRk=; b=A+s9MHvLpq6Ypiy8qjVlylT+MbBf2rpa9BIC1SAjhouEUsoQ5gMHcSTTwju53L3xlGk5/H faFiZlON78XzjkT3TE/mznNd7Wvo7yTJeP2BMOxwAz4XhRl/552EYoqmcmF9d81qIL6Hk1 jnBB95Dv33x30HiQE70NDLku31byUDw= Received: from mail-ua1-f72.google.com (mail-ua1-f72.google.com [209.85.222.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-259-Mg7GXfzFNGSbVOa9LoxatQ-1; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:19:19 -0500 Received: by mail-ua1-f72.google.com with SMTP id j7so2793494uan.11 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:19:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YHUipED5sD/4fk5lvNychQzVG/UAY1NUsNDdqzXLQug=; b=o1X3cWGlEsJEeAl946aZxQQyd+0pK3xjnZAOCCu8DCpOhhYzUoLq+HRn+c01oi7FXk YjWcZy1LCqEWZacJuNrnFxnikEFh6yUaAGo6IA2nH2cpiqu8U2QgKDj9BTrkx/mXLG8C 0iE3wQUakL4KacsIChPRhHMEM6yypopF/3o2DeG30nroEi4WdYa9YF3e6pI3SS3ylYIl vXFx2kWln1EMmKDwN20+VcIGGomx6qCKF6G3zgfchzVgMrpI6a3eyWnWY6CBYr4Ja908 xGBpF0jU4mQ2S53BB0EP66rxtI/e3Fss9gA9myYSB3jzlTTu+yXFzoMGG8QcTQBZMCyS b42w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUHV9s6DqJwNS4F2WaBxsJfrJYDvOLiodyUb0ZYzxyVDj8n3cB8 E3yzgzVXA71xqtp8YjJeh3HIVJwgFGeGzyIdA95LiFCFwUcA1zAcbcdPIl4VKkG6//2Gr1117Hw x5xP0ZhXRxbeMxRLEb6I= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:48ab:: with SMTP id x40mr18743232uac.126.1574698758473; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:19:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzxGQxKsMt2xSSf3jC34jrsQcrJnRAFsbPs5xOdkCyJyIeCBTXKCzynq4rN/31418Jx1PC6yppFpfu6uyn/id0= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:48ab:: with SMTP id x40mr18743207uac.126.1574698758025; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:19:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 17:19:07 +0100 Message-ID: To: Neil Horman , Thomas Monjalon Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , Olivier Matz , Ferruh Yigit , Andrew Rybchenko , Raslan Darawsheh X-MC-Unique: Mg7GXfzFNGSbVOa9LoxatQ-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Build with coverage fail on rte_flow_dynf_metadata_offs is not flagged as experimental X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 9:18 PM David Marchand wrote: > - I don't think variables were considered in the rte_experimental > framework: seeing the __rte_experimental macro, I doubt it would work > for variables to be put in .text. > Do we need a different marker for those? or did I miss something else? > Neil? > Sent a RFC: https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/63290/ We can discuss in this new thread. --=20 David Marchand