DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: "Wang, Yipeng1" <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
	"Gobriel, Sameh" <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>,
	 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>,
	 "Medvedkin, Vladimir" <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] test/hash: fix buffer overflow
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 21:54:10 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8woJZZN3q6sTx1XGGqqOO-UAv-g9p925ZhhEg+oOUxxuA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21a6e602-1138-b8bb-e5c1-ff9c6c314c59@intel.com>

On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 5:58 PM Medvedkin, Vladimir
<vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com> wrote:
> > I am not against the fix, but it seems to test something different
> > than what an application using the hash library would do.
> > Or if an application directly calls this hash function, maybe the unit
> > test should not test it via rte_hash_create (which seems to defeat the
> > abstraction).
> >
>
> I'd say that user should not use this hash function with rte_hash.
> Yipeng, Sameh, Bruce,
> what do you think?

Guys, can we conclude?
Thanks.


-- 
David Marchand


  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-20 19:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-08 21:28 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-10-11 11:03 ` David Marchand
2021-10-13 19:26   ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2021-10-14  7:04     ` David Marchand
2021-10-14 17:46       ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2021-10-13 19:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-10-14  8:34   ` David Marchand
2021-10-14 17:47     ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2021-10-14 17:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-10-15  9:33     ` David Marchand
2021-10-15 13:02       ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2021-10-19  7:02         ` David Marchand
2021-10-19 15:57           ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2021-10-20 19:54             ` David Marchand [this message]
2021-10-20 20:49               ` Wang, Yipeng1
2021-10-21  7:40     ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJFAV8woJZZN3q6sTx1XGGqqOO-UAv-g9p925ZhhEg+oOUxxuA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
    --cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git