From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1919A41EB1; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 16:36:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFB540DF6; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 16:36:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC8440DDC for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 16:36:14 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1678980973; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XKt8sY1+qZkFtdAObaaZVO7rKUloPaBgKcFnLRDRWNk=; b=Ypp+LZOQbROK5iQ2QNGf1nzCSEQ4oCndDLkNfhe2k5TtKDudc4/iAM3LrYnDGRz5e6dA/P xfYNYSaqfy4a+5vnjcsGOClQkP+qq3PovJz1eZmwWTvZCU3eW0dwA5zuXS4RIFJR0pdaWD d/mq8eK8Gu4i9OveWicfY3KW384eh70= Received: from mail-pl1-f199.google.com (mail-pl1-f199.google.com [209.85.214.199]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-176-oO1gIe60OpSWjhl79ZwUAQ-1; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 11:36:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: oO1gIe60OpSWjhl79ZwUAQ-1 Received: by mail-pl1-f199.google.com with SMTP id a9-20020a170902b58900b0019e2eafafddso1175521pls.7 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 08:36:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678980971; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XKt8sY1+qZkFtdAObaaZVO7rKUloPaBgKcFnLRDRWNk=; b=DfQJ8uO4hV5gEHGmswuGA8U54tW/F5qtySnDoUOjSrNE+BEbZSyR7/IBhsbqqcBvZJ WhqdFXZcZT+HQO0d+1O2jwz0Dp1r9HW0GbK5gFdjOAqqUAkSNy+g2PSPC7o2xpEMn/nQ qYhgDd8yW4eoOzkhHFl+PTIsgmVCcUMULDePEoUwxJKGGjtFAk4DpBrJ+cT+BGbrDVvN oF+MxBucmpDyyXMDpi/vUisNMUc19SdL5rWKYkU6TNAXHY/A6iwUJfZvGYqlCuYDUpEP 7BErBCq3CUfL1gW42ZwFvzydYC1+RL8Gxm92EUJzB4/WL7sh1DqPImeN14fBQHKE40NY qiWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKV9ddL1hbRbfK1sg8g4BpwGuhbj6sgWAnrz6jq5zlh+KDwfi8zp sD/qjQMBEPkBdLEWVK7XDo5Js/gRbPpHqEECuQEJWMXv5xDCZEzVRNemS9Z/zyOXOAr8mRsW+Dq e7YI5Tmwjra7YWJMFxbQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:a11:b0:625:f78a:56f with SMTP id p17-20020a056a000a1100b00625f78a056fmr910842pfh.3.1678980971392; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 08:36:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9zFuoxjBMfQVKSSalE8co+CX1ATDgYS7WVPcKyX2r/2CL4lMV66o1PrJdCGAWQxzeS0FxQeomnz4NF2tJq7FA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:a11:b0:625:f78a:56f with SMTP id p17-20020a056a000a1100b00625f78a056fmr910836pfh.3.1678980971117; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 08:36:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230313093450.2560058-1-vfialko@marvell.com> <20230313130428.2650232-1-vfialko@marvell.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 16:36:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] reorder: fix registration of dynamic field in mbuf To: "Pattan, Reshma" Cc: Volodymyr Fialko , "dev@dpdk.org" , Andrew Rybchenko , Stephen Hemminger , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , Anoob Joseph , "stable@dpdk.org" , "Mcnamara, John" X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 4:47=E2=80=AFPM Pattan, Reshma wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Marchand > > > A gentle reminder, please review and ack/comment. > > > Can we have this merged before RC3? > > > > I did not go into depth this time, the fix seems ok. > > Reshma, please review. > Unfortunately do not have a bandwidth to review this. I am ok if someone = who already reviewed ACKs this. That's a pity. I don't think there is a huge amount of work on this library. I would have expected one review every other month or so is acceptable. The fix looks correct to me, nobody objects, I'll take it as is. --=20 David Marchand