Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mempool: accept user flags only

[David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:37 AM Andrew Rybchenko
<andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> wrote:
> > diff --git a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h
> > index 88bcbc51ef..d2bf2843f7 100644
> > --- a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h
> > +++ b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h
> > @@ -258,6 +258,15 @@ struct rte_mempool {
> >  #define MEMPOOL_F_POOL_CREATED   0x0010 /**< Internal: pool is created. */
> >  #define MEMPOOL_F_NO_IOVA_CONTIG 0x0020 /**< Don't need IOVA contiguous objs. */
> >
> > +/**
> > + * This macro lists all the mempool flags an application may request.
> > + */
> > +#define MEMPOOL_VALID_USER_FLAGS (MEMPOOL_F_NO_SPREAD \
>
> I think RTE_ prefix is missing here since it is in a public
> header now.
>
> > +     | MEMPOOL_F_NO_CACHE_ALIGN \
> > +     | MEMPOOL_F_SP_PUT \
> > +     | MEMPOOL_F_SC_GET \
> > +     | MEMPOOL_F_NO_IOVA_CONTIG \
> > +     )
> >  /**
> >   * @internal When debug is enabled, store some statistics.
> >   *
> >
>
> Should we make a patch to add defines with RTE_ prefix and
> add a deprecation for old flags without RTE_ prefix?
>
> Olivier, what do you think? If you have time to care about it,
> it would be great. (I'm unfamiliar with coccinelle yet).

Andrew,

RTE_ prefixing subject put aside, are you ok with this patch?


-- 
David Marchand