From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BADEA052A; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:37:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F025A2402D1; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:37:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 106D22402C3 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:36:59 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1612255019; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=C9muFeiYF5RvG55CNspdZRitvSLwmlC8J7QKl7EtAxM=; b=B64KtzyjBrFf0/ndacT7lLqDphO8s+cqkDoURvb7GmTfGl99rJi3ZICqbGGPwoA0/Mrd5r /QeJi17Z8bGWbbRaNkBCrWEvzn3l/+TpNrhRZhIHGkw0aS2ZQuj9+6qNkYWZHsrdcEtoql g2RrZx9HSD9fFBELHm/k1Zg7RLS+yLA= Received: from mail-vk1-f198.google.com (mail-vk1-f198.google.com [209.85.221.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-214-HAAxnQgPPdmDo6hsrVnJ8w-1; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 03:36:56 -0500 X-MC-Unique: HAAxnQgPPdmDo6hsrVnJ8w-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id o135so4101951vko.3 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 00:36:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=C9muFeiYF5RvG55CNspdZRitvSLwmlC8J7QKl7EtAxM=; b=auOpGnkRkLGI9+xAKyOFJtXnphb/mWNImf4RZfcxBmmSSDEMSWQL25H/r0PrzfxCH8 02KfUaGuuGjl+WwylpaJlBHXPHM/dZ0OdpoIKHql1Ylw4CBw3XUiWdnL6weto6SU3/EL rDc/D4TRIHwxV3GvMSpF+UXStWzKB7E3fmy2Z2uW/4lf2LD8lDy0uDUb7MWDFWqMlena kit38VJiNJFUOln95Tua/eiZ760+Pv5u3IGGGL0hhjEf0ZhpJAnrhdEGLE8ruRPHRy+M Uk+UhQbNo2PzHXAZpC3Ed0Olbmi+zi0nTh+fTDQvmk7R8MZwllkMuSNu8hU6o65KpwT3 g14Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531EAQT/+j0thdQlsKJanzE7GCfjByVQYCs4bZN9irtg5MSZdpvF I6ZN0w8247aYnJDoiZ/9zuEMZG6UuMyIMRs1vQk8Kznr3qn44zgvFupEFjwqT1HNrfac6D+wq5l 22sen5eefSBb10NPVAUA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:3136:: with SMTP id f22mr12213960vsh.17.1612255015701; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 00:36:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyjHdb2YIxsWaD3MEL83lusX59rkxSKwgBg5JRKXXYT//YFcM6N3sYWl8zMb+6FYTqtOKNTLldgO0LGLbdjGMo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:3136:: with SMTP id f22mr12213951vsh.17.1612255015542; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 00:36:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210126153819.63625-1-leyi.rong@intel.com> <20210127142706.6290-1-leyi.rong@intel.com> <2799531.7hoMMOPb9E@thomas> In-Reply-To: <2799531.7hoMMOPb9E@thomas> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:36:44 +0100 Message-ID: To: Leyi Rong , Dmitry Kozlyuk Cc: Thomas Monjalon , Bruce Richardson , Tal Shnaiderman , Qi Zhang , Pallavi Kadam , "Yigit, Ferruh" , Ranjit Menon , Beilei Xing , dev , Aaron Conole , ci@dpdk.org, dpdklab Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] fix mingw build error X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:27 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 28/01/2021 13:28, David Marchand: > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 3:47 PM Leyi Rong wrote: > > > > > > This patchset fix mingw build error when avx512 is introduced. > > > > > > --- > > > v2: > > > - Set i40e_avx512_cc_support to false to avoid the build error under > > > windows with mingw. > > > > > > Leyi Rong (2): > > > config: disable avx512 on mingw cross build > > > net/i40e: fix mingw build error > > > > > > config/x86/cross-mingw | 3 +++ > > > drivers/net/i40e/meson.build | 4 ++++ > > > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > > LGTM with fc32 mingw. > > Tested-by: David Marchand > > Applied, thanks. > > Dmitry found a lighter alternative option to be tested and discussed. We still have build failures at UNH for Windows, on the rc2 tag: http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2021-February/177464.html Is this issue being looked at? -- David Marchand