From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: i.maximets@samsung.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, tiwei.bie@intel.com,
zhihong.wang@intel.com, thomas@monjalon.net,
ferruh.yigit@intel.com, ian.stokes@intel.com,
Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/virtio: avoid annoying IOPL call related errors
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 16:02:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8wtNjBtrb6=OW9+psXC8Px40b8UfAFHJwojayOiyijpyw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181123143620.10480-1-i.maximets@samsung.com>
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 3:36 PM Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com>
wrote:
> In case of running with not enough capabilities, i.e. running as
> non-root user any application linked with DPDK prints the message
> about IOPL call failure even if it was just called like
> './testpmd --help'. For example, this beaks most of the OVS unit
> tests if it built with DPDK support.
>
breaks
>
> Let's register the virtio driver unconditionally and print error
> message while probing the device. Silent iopl() call left in the
> constructor to have privileges as early as possible as it was before.
>
Yes, that's the important part to avoid issues with the interrupt thread
which is spawned later and inherits the capa from the thread running
rte_eal_init, iirc.
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com>
>
Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
I wonder if we could move the "new" iopl check even later when probing a
device since it only makes sense in legacy mode when using uio.
But this patch keeps previous behaviour.
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c
> b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c
> index 508cbc46f..b8152a75c 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c
> @@ -556,9 +556,11 @@ int rte_eal_has_hugepages(void)
> int
> rte_eal_iopl_init(void)
> {
> - static int fd;
> + static int fd = -1;
> +
> + if (fd < 0)
> + fd = open("/dev/io", O_RDWR);
>
> - fd = open("/dev/io", O_RDWR);
> if (fd < 0)
> return -1;
> /* keep fd open for iopl */
>
Good catch.
Should be a separate fix.
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-23 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20181123141748eucas1p132a221972a87ec82b50d4a6c83bd9646@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2018-11-23 14:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Ilya Maximets
[not found] ` <CGME20181123143625eucas1p1def3421fa13b5aec7204549932c75bb7@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2018-11-23 14:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ilya Maximets
2018-11-23 15:02 ` David Marchand [this message]
[not found] ` <CGME20181123153936eucas1p13bfbe13fcda92de7760ac768fcab43c5@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2018-11-23 15:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] IOPL related fixes Ilya Maximets
[not found] ` <CGME20181123153947eucas1p169a2b7cec02b2edd7258aef11b1c1e2e@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2018-11-23 15:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] eal/bsd: fix possible IOPL fd leak Ilya Maximets
2018-11-23 17:32 ` Maxime Coquelin
[not found] ` <CGME20181123153951eucas1p1218331b7e51db8eae3073fa6a14f3bcd@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2018-11-23 15:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] net/virtio: avoid annoying IOPL call related errors Ilya Maximets
2018-11-23 17:34 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-11-23 15:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] IOPL related fixes Maxime Coquelin
2018-11-23 15:53 ` Ilya Maximets
2018-11-23 16:25 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-11-23 20:07 ` Kevin Traynor
2018-11-23 22:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-25 10:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-26 9:49 ` Kevin Traynor
2018-11-27 14:05 ` David Marchand
2018-11-23 17:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/virtio: avoid annoying IOPL call related errors Timothy Redaelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJFAV8wtNjBtrb6=OW9+psXC8Px40b8UfAFHJwojayOiyijpyw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=i.maximets@samsung.com \
--cc=ian.stokes@intel.com \
--cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).