From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3EBA0548; Thu, 27 May 2021 15:24:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF5940150; Thu, 27 May 2021 15:24:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18C440143 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 15:24:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1622121881; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PBIyvtkGxRI8Ls3vgsIU4g0KwFFPW3T8U+oT2Tdjvf0=; b=KiFaBKHWvL0Jd/59BnaFjQ2AgXxVnXx1qTRZpSyEWPrK3q+QYF7+unYODxzFfgNbb9PDzh JwYngdXrVc8R2iXeYf3SYQioMmKvYZbBuYHSRolBen7i23jbXkFPwfs2sM5o9QVG2OqpYr kk78V9KUALqyRYsHgPLqZ1ACGqkv0M4= Received: from mail-ua1-f71.google.com (mail-ua1-f71.google.com [209.85.222.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-86-aZODoxPOP0qpx69G1sgwzw-1; Thu, 27 May 2021 09:24:39 -0400 X-MC-Unique: aZODoxPOP0qpx69G1sgwzw-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f71.google.com with SMTP id r4-20020ab070c40000b02902064b454facso179385ual.6 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 06:24:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PBIyvtkGxRI8Ls3vgsIU4g0KwFFPW3T8U+oT2Tdjvf0=; b=EIOPdf44IA0rm/F0TrCCr4aV6exoLSS7uuYn0yr0N4EnsKJPK+ybHgjfuD4DHSS2+b KXNrRVOxl49XUZfQe2k8QxcUd30q3nkWGpKD6YGrbQMuSbCrPAS/LVULx8LbGTw6jkiI al3EPMwnAEz6g8uNGPyObqV97KrHO+RJVESfHqcRXBF9gdmysyBPTssrCyPARneRH9is 4ONyi/ZwiLscqzoS1MXDPvNeWFxC0gISJI1F7We6+dvU8QZeU0TDA/g7Iuu4Z+1mp0tP NMvir6RZjc9DKvunmCOHkNuQ9dcLfUDET6qsnFunFNuriZm0FIYajcARQcE63d7FFVsu vC7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533POnrg80pM9AZinP5UsObY21wqw+zNDicoB+5Wf5ES33i1uOH6 Wq8oU7dYU8cgSTp7O/Jyb76DqOMU1lutyIAqZ3MtgI/+0MDe61gfvxMCTYsMlBBGS9Mf9a1aYkL UCK3e3RlcCzqRy9lT93c= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:3785:: with SMTP id d5mr2161966uav.126.1622121879361; Thu, 27 May 2021 06:24:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzqj71A7vJ/OPQP4cICpgiEWxf3BsofCqoP6589VddfiYXXKrOx1kxI3fu3SKJr2UGk+CjLmpgDCXMBxoJuTnI= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:3785:: with SMTP id d5mr2161923uav.126.1622121879119; Thu, 27 May 2021 06:24:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200128083819.32834-1-asomalap@amd.com> <20201225080358.366162-1-asomalap@amd.com> In-Reply-To: <20201225080358.366162-1-asomalap@amd.com> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 15:24:27 +0200 Message-ID: To: Somalapuram Amaranath Cc: dev , Akhil Goyal , Thomas Monjalon Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] crypto/ccp: enable IOMMU for CCP X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 9:06 AM wrote: > > From: Amaranath Somalapuram > > CCP use vdev framework, and vdev framework don=E2=80=99t support IOMMU. > Adding custom IOMMU support for AMD CCP driver. I am currently looking at pci bus patches/cleanups. I ended up looking at crypto/ccp. This driver code contains a lot of features duplicated with the pci bus. Why is the ccp driver not a PCI driver? --=20 David Marchand