From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733C5A0528; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:57:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43FB51BF94; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:57:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1221BF91 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:57:15 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1594976234; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Mne/Ec6J8zzUF35yCjOUZ9ce5hRf7jjLvhcfKghQaZU=; b=hnwr0/v9tX62OD2oSKEieahssZcmFbTtOh3IyLeqC4fg5NTKB6gD5GLXCwXKaUkE1MQoUA 1huZF+ERj6rEUxt2gDeYPsIT+8E0zNaLkuVqJ03nskTfDlEEpOog+Qg2y6PAAbgOjWIrZn SWTpBYbWqMX9Pu3SZLiQPF07eZ0qlOY= Received: from mail-vs1-f72.google.com (mail-vs1-f72.google.com [209.85.217.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-33-sMdyJvN7POCKE3yWS1UKfA-1; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 04:57:10 -0400 X-MC-Unique: sMdyJvN7POCKE3yWS1UKfA-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f72.google.com with SMTP id q5so1603077vsp.9 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 01:57:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Mne/Ec6J8zzUF35yCjOUZ9ce5hRf7jjLvhcfKghQaZU=; b=ojGrxznrYnrZlugU51Fl2qYxCQziayqXP8tkHr3lIRg0p7e9jrUMtKa97zmi3ZYsWE SXDNIVOUdCO7R1g17dYgr/OsFZOctdevHqG+Hencjp/69ShozoqFei5OrouiJVzQs7x0 aeAPvpjU+TSUIzzlWUzWswfq5HfksmSFccZttyb406/X3VXFPfEpEJRmxbrpXBVL27W+ /VFi5eGHvHqG1/pEJA1r9alwz2kAvjxcjLR/dPUB0GBh+oUJGUPntKJ6M8/ZfmWjGvBG /W3SKFQkesj09P4C9tdkKS7/trRq3aYEL3UcnOS+GsnKkXR5dbXJf0SZnIRUf6MO4GDT 7Aig== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530IBHaaiDv/+tMkjp9irguSV81eneOMVjuZ4yY8R+AjEMc1xhI9 NT9QhjH17fBHq9fpalMdQ297L11afIKNUfgLvOuMg0jkf/Yo3fzfAaIlcgNis/iwvak6V8z+UVC Jsa1InF4xx90j3ji8/+U= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:3ad3:: with SMTP id h202mr6632514vka.80.1594976230510; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 01:57:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyBBP5yXpHfJiG93c9ofp3gEg0qyQzIY/+gsNUTF/8342qRZGFjG56lzwOSPsy3OXvLu7m7bTcK1Wa9PcRebiQ= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:3ad3:: with SMTP id h202mr6632503vka.80.1594976230260; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 01:57:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6d0bf076-c9bd-564c-20f6-ba8a49bc2389@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <6d0bf076-c9bd-564c-20f6-ba8a49bc2389@intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:56:59 +0200 Message-ID: To: Van Haaren Harry Cc: Lukasz Wojciechowski , Igor Romanov , Honnappa Nagarahalli , Phil Yang , dev , Aaron Conole , Ferruh Yigit Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Random failure in service_autotest X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 12:41 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > On 7/15/2020 11:14 AM, David Marchand wrote: > > Hello Harry and guys who touched the service code recently :-) > > > > I spotted a failure for the service UT in Travis: > > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/361097992#L18697 > > > > I found only a single instance of this failure and tried to reproduce > > it with my usual "brute" active loop with no success so far. > > +1, I didn't able to reproduce it in my environment but observed it in the > Travis CI. > > > > > Any chance it could be due to recent changes? > > https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=f3c256b621262e581d3edcca383df83875ab7ebe > > https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=048db4b6dcccaee9277ce5b4fbb2fe684b212e22 I can see more occurrences of the issue in the CI. I just applied the patch changing the log level for test assert, in the hope it will help. -- David Marchand