From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB864A00C2; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 15:02:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB80E40698; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 15:02:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7DC940689 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 15:02:46 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1672754566; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=anAgeYdNRzpetT0oz8MbLscNGv143+UPnilwGi7eiCQ=; b=XDF1p5b9Vd0IBLFfTUp4yTYV964cTivZN1Uz2fRzY+dOENYICDbRMQNgzXnvPKAHWCUd5B R2G/EoXJmZHu3H62XMSB1Zp2K7lEJmqBxWOmO5UmKdiNCZ+W1A41fASCML/zkKTVkP4LV7 3SqW+D2mr9Bkdr3hfsAa3CSmzjtPA0U= Received: from mail-pl1-f198.google.com (mail-pl1-f198.google.com [209.85.214.198]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-376-KQhhdWSFMZyWHcF-K5C8Bg-1; Tue, 03 Jan 2023 09:02:42 -0500 X-MC-Unique: KQhhdWSFMZyWHcF-K5C8Bg-1 Received: by mail-pl1-f198.google.com with SMTP id a12-20020a170902eccc00b001927f1d6316so15108523plh.10 for ; Tue, 03 Jan 2023 06:02:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=anAgeYdNRzpetT0oz8MbLscNGv143+UPnilwGi7eiCQ=; b=SdqdFtLJwAABljQuU32kiaUUwY66LlwOmpvpk2LXT5yZbmIUDLpepaJy9hSDYWzQX3 /BNYhR1Un4T+VxAQNKQDVurIrotkwKKIxburt4e5NvAPXgaCqDeUK+NGNIyCkj0DSMs1 REWgPuq4Vu1XhSwYxZMtVdw2BsD3kmi0J7td9KljC8oGtn/E98fbc78cQ0lzQMU12kj7 52c7shTAy4g93OU2fDQLFc89+qB3mVDwyx+OksR9GbAjl3VJoKu1TMOpWvv82uCZbDKH lJlhG0gcmbzfP0999LSvNKgdGpv4LPsKo+EbyS2CLycHL6oeOdDnQs8pjHf9826UvRJk ldlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqXF83D1HSN4rbwggc7dC8SQGM8ba3LEVR8cVff0DX1a++CvZR5 809FMAv00LQm4XHWSmo6UHbbrQq975fAUDclyh9Q8uy3XePpYjG7nbDj6QMIl45j3TUh1rQvANW th9AwEX5KmUDG01BHvhQ= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:264d:b0:226:1564:643c with SMTP id pa13-20020a17090b264d00b002261564643cmr1594886pjb.206.1672754561379; Tue, 03 Jan 2023 06:02:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXv07h2bREJHf2XcVfKk+RFiAvxW30cj5q9+TevKDr+m/y0rTXcv1HfvR0FOkOwd4V8+aVHdJEzTCVc0zIsEuik= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:264d:b0:226:1564:643c with SMTP id pa13-20020a17090b264d00b002261564643cmr1594881pjb.206.1672754560944; Tue, 03 Jan 2023 06:02:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221212143715.29649-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <20221213091837.87953-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20221213091837.87953-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 15:02:29 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/i40e: don't check link status on device start To: Yuying Zhang , Beilei Xing Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, Qi Zhang , Dapeng Yu , Wenxuan Wu , Jie Wang X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Hi i40e maintainers, On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 10:19 AM David Marchand wrote: > > The mentioned changes broke existing applications when the link status > of i40e ports is down at the time the port is started. > Revert those changes, the original issue will need a different fix. > > Fixes: a4ba77367923 ("net/i40e: enable maximum frame size at port level") > Fixes: 2184f7cdeeaa ("net/i40e: fix max frame size config at port level") > Fixes: 719469f13b11 ("net/i40e: fix jumbo frame Rx with X722") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand This issue was reported only by our QE, but I suspect that real deployments will get affected. Please review. Thanks. -- David Marchand