DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
	 Amit Gupta <agupta3@marvell.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	 Michael Santana <maicolgabriel@hotmail.com>,
	"Wang, Yipeng1" <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
	 Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ci: increase unit test timeout
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:47:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8x18q2=RNVF9Ad6Ka8XhVN3o9n0+3d3cn583MDF_Wj0nw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36007098.10thIPus4b@xps>

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:03 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> 28/01/2020 21:53, Aaron Conole:
> > Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> writes:
> >
> > > Timeout multiplier was 3, which gives 30 seconds for unit test but still
> > > some unit test was timing out time to time and travis reporting false
> > > positive failures.
> > >
> > > Increasing the multiplier to 10, which makes timeout duration
> > > 100seconds.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > It's okay to me.  I thought there was an effort to split out performance
> > part of this test from the functional part, but that seems to not have
> > gone anywhere.
> >
> > Acked-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
>
> NACK
> The fix should be to split perf tests out of fast-tests.
>
> The following patch is splitting hash_readwrite_autotest:
>         https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/58726/
> But we are still waiting for a patch splitting hash_readwrite_lf_autotest.
> Please consider working on unit tests as a HIGH PRIORITY (using uppercase ;).
> We should not have to wait so long to see performance tests removed
> from fast unit tests (while keeping the functional coverage).

Just applied series
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=8401&state=*.
So marking this patch as rejected.

Thanks.


-- 
David Marchand


      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-05 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-28 16:28 Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-28 18:39 ` Michael Santana
2020-01-28 20:53 ` Aaron Conole
2020-01-30 11:03   ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-30 15:35     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-01-31 15:44       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-02-05 18:47     ` David Marchand [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJFAV8x18q2=RNVF9Ad6Ka8XhVN3o9n0+3d3cn583MDF_Wj0nw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=agupta3@marvell.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=maicolgabriel@hotmail.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).