From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BB7A04DE; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:44:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40245C9A2; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:44:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDC2C97A for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:44:28 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1604069067; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Joqba1kEHrfyMbnoMHT1SfVIKUaEVECvZhW5fgGJmbg=; b=gViK7yuSsp8gjk/NM/kZwZZengmgnG8sXKqqsKtXSZ+Z5hFB+XVEfg1Xr0pbBwmGqDMHbN ptOEi6gzSIOwL2NyjiZS6BfpCDscDe2pyw0R7YwuPqZKXCLg27I0PbvDplsAHa6UAVvA7T O26vp2pFjM8zIeovJkgOjWO/7O+VkhE= Received: from mail-vk1-f199.google.com (mail-vk1-f199.google.com [209.85.221.199]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-153-iGkMnFRIMh2cngp-DpVzBg-1; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:44:23 -0400 X-MC-Unique: iGkMnFRIMh2cngp-DpVzBg-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f199.google.com with SMTP id s6so1698410vkg.12 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 07:44:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Joqba1kEHrfyMbnoMHT1SfVIKUaEVECvZhW5fgGJmbg=; b=BSxR9sn325lE2TuWFxx0N+MHB9ePKWN5VBSrlLXOKr78erkFUE0kM/uV3ckJIcUoKh /yIesg1WIKCyUbuZjM8LunwnWq7VkSK2HZmMt8dY2zn1dVYgb6AuVi/Nas0RlrwnpZVM ceG9yuHb/8FfP0NIJYW0ghabY9XtBlJMoR53EGYEYCOKeYD1j0dxqTGbPEMVG8/4XCpP hKunoFVEBe1YKpm0y4Rf7gl+BKFeq+OE7JKSxbRSejAYWecIbwkeVkGHSBWiD4YEX2k2 1ylILYPl8ZaP4y54/+iGyBsIKWHahqkMwZOQ2QNCGiHdIfwrURykb7P818OlV2rqwNy8 JSWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531SM74MJwvL/vVPJ/ALKhpE6ouheba5cdMD3QCbrW1arV8nN5r/ mBEDjGZ4nL4XUyqNhWsdofDLFM8qFLpQAryKfh8gx73Gh/JDhDA3YBbrrJCKPOmncCmkBQrXXVw XGfkfTanUfEIyhCTNC1Q= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:9004:: with SMTP id s4mr7391733vkd.22.1604069062558; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 07:44:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy5p8UKaL7jli8omOSwq32hMpHYkWa+aOv25UHIzHbegXO+BvG7LItXRQEODrQDQCFucnlhCM4AolfSc1aALbs= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:9004:: with SMTP id s4mr7391701vkd.22.1604069062278; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 07:44:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201016060349.19940-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20201016060349.19940-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:44:10 +0100 Message-ID: To: Honnappa Nagarahalli Cc: dev , "Mcnamara, John" , "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" , =?UTF-8?Q?Juraj_Linke=C5=A1?= , nd , dpdk stable Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] test/rcu: fix array subscript is above array bounds X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 8:04 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote: > > When RTE_MAX_LCORE value is small, following compiler errors > are observed. > > ../app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c:296:54: error: iteration 2 invokes > undefined behavior [-Werror=aggressive-loop-optimizations] > > ../app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c:315:55: error: array subscript is above > array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds] > > Fixes: b87089b0bb19 ("test/rcu: add API and functional tests") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang Tested-by: Lukasz Wojciechowski Reviewed-by: Lukasz Wojciechowski Series applied, thanks. -- David Marchand