DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: move debug_autotest out of fast suite
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 15:19:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8x2c=Trh7gXsVnBv6niLy3VdZrtqgmFBUh-b=dyM1x6QA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21f62967f1db1385f47e449d9bbfc6e3fbf3375b.camel@debian.org>

On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 3:13 PM Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> wrote:
> RTE>>EAL: Detected 2 lcore(s)
> EAL: Detected 1 NUMA nodes
> EAL: Multi-process socket /var/run/dpdk/debug_autotest/mp_socket
> EAL: Selected IOVA mode 'VA'
> EAL: Probing VFIO support...
> APP: HPET is not enabled, using TSC as default timer
> RTE>>debug_autotest
> 10: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/dpdk-test(+0x61c6a) [0x5562b61f7c6a]]
> 9: [/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xea) [0x7f9793188d0a]]
> 8: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/dpdk-test(+0x386ae) [0x5562b61ce6ae]]
> 7: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_cmdline.so.21(cmdline_in+0x71) [0x7f9793925841]]
> 6: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_cmdline.so.21(rdline_char_in+0x36b) [0x7f9793928abb]]
> 5: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_cmdline.so.21(+0x3770) [0x7f9793925770]]
> 4: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_cmdline.so.21(cmdline_parse+0x1af) [0x7f979392664f]]
> 3: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/dpdk-test(+0x61d5b) [0x5562b61f7d5b]]
> 2: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/dpdk-test(+0xc2c13) [0x5562b6258c13]]
> 1: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_eal.so.21(rte_dump_stack+0x2e) [0x7f9793a931be]]
> PANIC in test_panic():
> Test Debug
> 11: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/dpdk-test(+0x61c6a) [0x5562b61f7c6a]]
> 10: [/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xea) [0x7f9793188d0a]]
> 9: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/dpdk-test(+0x386ae) [0x5562b61ce6ae]]
> 8: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_cmdline.so.21(cmdline_in+0x71) [0x7f9793925841]]
> 7: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_cmdline.so.21(rdline_char_in+0x36b) [0x7f9793928abb]]
> 6: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_cmdline.so.21(+0x3770) [0x7f9793925770]]
> 5: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_cmdline.so.21(cmdline_parse+0x1af) [0x7f979392664f]]
> 4: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/dpdk-test(+0x61d5b) [0x5562b61f7d5b]]
> 3: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/dpdk-test(+0x3d671) [0x5562b61d3671]]
> 2: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_eal.so.21(__rte_panic+0xc1) [0x7f9793a7187f]]
> 1: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_eal.so.21(rte_dump_stack+0x2e) [0x7f9793a931be]]
> <...>
> debug_autotest time out (After 30.0 seconds)

Ah a timeout.
Could it be that coredumps (of the children processes here) are being captured?

Can you test with this patch:
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210125150539.27537-1-david.marchand@redhat.com/
?
It disables coredump generation in the autotests when failure is expected.


-- 
David Marchand


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-02 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-25 19:48 luca.boccassi
2021-03-01  8:03 ` David Marchand
2021-03-02 14:13   ` Luca Boccassi
2021-03-02 14:19     ` David Marchand [this message]
2021-03-02 16:02       ` Luca Boccassi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJFAV8x2c=Trh7gXsVnBv6niLy3VdZrtqgmFBUh-b=dyM1x6QA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).