From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618B3A034F; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:06:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4921E4111E; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:06:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE4C410F6 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:06:44 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1630325204; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CWljVjvqCn9Df5X87VV/yoSeEiMQAbDLTPj+ppCc8EY=; b=iy5WnxPDlpJ2bDIOTKZmVTZ+jI3urAHmP2tk+/BZLFAnxEJP92wOs3SY7phwi3s1AXAP6q xtbZJnG/9EhnEsmWI98FQidk7V9yyje5D+e30vmlff+QPE9VI+dpVfRg5xbp258sxNa2LL Ye0h5qQREL2Fvk8IOq73kCTeYhakSEw= Received: from mail-lj1-f198.google.com (mail-lj1-f198.google.com [209.85.208.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-302-ecP2T0vXNUqNYJRuer6LtQ-1; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:06:41 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ecP2T0vXNUqNYJRuer6LtQ-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f198.google.com with SMTP id w11-20020a2e998b000000b001c071349c96so3841880lji.15 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 05:06:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CWljVjvqCn9Df5X87VV/yoSeEiMQAbDLTPj+ppCc8EY=; b=KSvC5Xn2tZJ1B5EoqDJ+V3avlGQcWaD6gMXcDH3glvv+TJAoo14lvKD4U5YGu+ZGMr yTZCPW5LDvmD5MFXsJsl83WX7ldyDGYrLGs1IjTHLD7o+hp92OlILLH0q7yXudGAbjvg Q5gjBwHWfvh5sr2s2OsN8fv61ibhw1cIB+sln7JA1EQO3uyvQvF1Xdl4QdyNTTqAHqWT +p1R3p3Gk23Fxf3RPQVVio5R+C1V9Wyi3lKhF+JOftTiHgGid1ooDw5LbkwEiTJuxWAf Ez/mIXYI1wb/cPV4pNoB/ytTMZk8Y9XJv7mszkdHUps6V0qQyrcGwrEaYYL6V3gWdHAE JKEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532BotpCLFskedx780cXlYV/e061XA+6UkOPbZFUNZaVfjH/S48x PNexu5Y7DCtJ16g9xisXob2Azc7j/M9DA1s+6ZKI6XRGfPZVEBLSQliwtCQl4Maxz+VD1sKNiDy eu+hl81cyKEUM/5KIhV8= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:46fb:: with SMTP id q27mr17235826lfo.595.1630325199514; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 05:06:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxGnTAx9TJ1I7ayr1gWs9ZDhPQ5omlgKDSdCMER1k8mu3+pIFyfeWmhVjG9t5s6kIApD6X6ROk8ekqugHgtwp8= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:46fb:: with SMTP id q27mr17235814lfo.595.1630325199303; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 05:06:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <66ba0b52-83bf-f7a0-aa79-66a267af32c4@intel.com> <3485790.tFL5Z3R0ll@thomas> In-Reply-To: <3485790.tFL5Z3R0ll@thomas> From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:06:27 +0200 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Kamaraj P , dev , Anatoly Burakov , Ferruh Yigit , ksimha@cisco.com, kalas@cisco.com, seveluch@cisco.com, "techboard@dpdk.org" Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Running DPDK application with non-previlege mode X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 1:59 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 30/08/2021 13:26, Ferruh Yigit: > > On 8/30/2021 8:52 AM, Kamaraj P wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > Some more info. > > > We are using DPDK 19.11. > > > > > > When we bringup application with --security-opt seccomp=unconfined > > > option.. > > > THe application bringup successfully and didnt observe any error when DPDK > > > init logs. > > > Will that --security-opt seccomp=unconfined option recommended for > > > non-previlege mode for DPDK application ? > > > Please suggest. > > > > > > > + Anatoly, he may have experience on running on non-privilege mode. > > > > > > Thomas, David, > > > > What do you think documenting how to run as non root, we had similar question > > before, if memory serves me right Red Hat was looking for same thing at some point. > > I started working on such documentation, focusing on mlx5 use case. > I need more time to complete it. > > > If we are agree, perhaps we can find a volunteer in the tech board for it. > > I would be volunteer, and welcome any help. OVS already did some integration for this, and I can help too. -- David Marchand