From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C60A0093; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:13:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22634C89; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:13:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827521023 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:13:46 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1592205225; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=q/xNNJIfi7+y9fNf2kaxHxhvf0tSbzu5ZLrqy1sS1cM=; b=ZcNxSicplKOcBHoL/wuKIyyIB/p7KTdktYSfLarzaU+ZK5Rl6InBloZCQOjw9YyGqQTuW+ ZOtoKp/kqjP8lb/i7iHBzXg24gKosPmbsOsNEgYeUaHh+n+mmyON8ZN7CuSAHQSs6AKlwB 7TKqPe274ZxxEyhK2J4Rpz+PRDQ69bw= Received: from mail-ua1-f71.google.com (mail-ua1-f71.google.com [209.85.222.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-319-7VFRNMbGOX6Jh6e625iR8Q-1; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 03:13:43 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 7VFRNMbGOX6Jh6e625iR8Q-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f71.google.com with SMTP id y3so6827056ual.6 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:13:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=q/xNNJIfi7+y9fNf2kaxHxhvf0tSbzu5ZLrqy1sS1cM=; b=SLbvZhYiIvpAQSWTfEv9Yy6FyoetWvjYHtF3y7nahvnxSghky7b/fxCqS2GZ9ztq1o eL4E2pWDgkL+MuPPsuIFc/P8wFSZFd1CLWQVeuOxpSZQA0Vjsm15F5/3VMPMlgFTgzx9 UlVQXK0ZxkM0kWopygmfWkvc6x7fGAzDRb0nF2ldIPCZnroy9BrUMLlMWFD0S5ZcZNUw 4qhhLzObJFQ04CO9YcWXbD7W2shIra1dwpwU0rPjMOpLT+AMck+C7muYfqd92xcxzBZC M+mqoX4tvNpGJ7d6MhTreCXoZbaMAYylIOHy03mz8F6KaGhkQsP+JFu1PNZTjQtTb0d3 s4Ew== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533rI14gAW+6BgO6zB3irIHSYYes95Z1dQsEQr9Lkqjjn0jSYCCz 2cCsMALlaZMJdsowZf+kova0phQfxhPFjDQ7ZGstsuRkA8oJXWKVZfQWSr1nxnWBGqGKc/ZK5OJ yqe9hPIoIOXifrSwikzQ= X-Received: by 2002:a67:b741:: with SMTP id l1mr18710552vsh.180.1592205223028; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:13:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz0els61gJm4W80ggRToPKkbiXiVTp12JVs+tZ9BxVC22jxmLTZJ3BxLtP3CCMyTikSE5a+Qn7C8TkIqjGVDjA= X-Received: by 2002:a67:b741:: with SMTP id l1mr18710543vsh.180.1592205222750; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:13:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200610144506.30505-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <20200610144506.30505-8-david.marchand@redhat.com> <9209a36a-c1b0-1a7f-236e-0cfeea954c54@ashroe.eu> In-Reply-To: <9209a36a-c1b0-1a7f-236e-0cfeea954c54@ashroe.eu> From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:13:31 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Kinsella, Ray" Cc: dev , Neil Horman , "Richardson, Bruce" , Thomas Monjalon X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] eal: add lcore hotplug notifications X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 8:34 AM Kinsella, Ray wrote: > > From ABI PoV, you are 100%. > > Is the agreed term 'callback'?, not 'notifier' for example rte_dev_event_callback_register, rte_mem_event_callback_register > > I did wonder however, if all these cb's would be better handled through a EventDev event notification style approach. I am reconsidering the term. callback seems better yes and, actually, there is no need for a lcore event framework. Cooking a v2 for this week. -- David Marchand